Cell-type-specific signatures of microRNAs on target mRNA expression

Sood, Pranidhi; Krek, Azra; Zavolan, Mihaela; Macino, Giuseppe; Rajewsky, Nikolaus

doi:10.1073/pnas.0511045103

Cited by 596 publications

(553 citation statements)

References 27 publications

(38 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

511

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…and tissues (Sood et al, 2006); thus, miRNAs could be acting to prevent transdifferentiation by preventing translation of potentially leaky master switch genes-in other words, have a protective role. This is supported by studies of pancreas regeneration in mammals, where Neurogenin 3 is silenced by miRNA after partial pancreatectomy (Joglekar et al, 2007).…”

Section: Micrornasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond early development: Xenopus as an emerging model for the study of regenerative mechanisms

Beck

Belmonte

Christen

2009

Developmental Dynamics

145

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While Xenopus is a well-known model system for early vertebrate development, in recent years, it has also emerged as a leading model for regeneration research. As an anuran amphibian, Xenopus laevis can regenerate the larval tail and limb by means of the formation of a proliferating blastema, the lens of the eye by transdifferentiation of nearby tissues, and also exhibits a partial regeneration of the postmetamorphic froglet forelimb. With the availability of inducible transgenic techniques for Xenopus, recent experiments are beginning to address the functional role of genes in the process of regeneration. The use of soluble inhibitors has also been very successful in this model. Using the more traditional advantages of Xenopus, others are providing important lineage data on the origin of the cells that make up the tissues of the regenerate. Finally, transcriptome analyses of regenerating tissues seek to identify the genes and cellular processes that enable successful regeneration.

show abstract

Section: Micrornasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond early development: Xenopus as an emerging model for the study of regenerative mechanisms

Beck

Belmonte

Christen

2009

Developmental Dynamics

145

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are a few hundred experimentally sequenced and predicted human miRNAs [10][11][12][13], and together, they hold the potential to regulate thousands of genes impacting a large variety of biological processes. Expression of many miRNAs is regulated in a tissue-specific and temporal manner, the full biological relevance of which remains to be unraveled [13][14][15][16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ectopic expression of miR-126*, an intronic product of the vascular endothelial EGF-like 7 gene, regulates prostein translation and invasiveness of prostate cancer LNCaP cells

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous noncoding RNAs that down-regulate gene expression by promoting cleavage or translational arrest of target mRNAs. While most miRNAs are transcribed from their own dedicated genes, some map to introns of 'host' transcripts, the biological significance of which remains unknown. Here, we show that prostate cells are naturally devoid of EGF-like domain 7 (Egfl7) transcripts and hence also deficient in a miRNA, miR-126*, generated from splicing and processing of its ninth intron. Use of recombinant and synthetic miRNAs or a specific antagomir established a role of miR-126* in silencing prostein in non-endothelial cells. We mapped two miR-126*-binding sites in the 3′UTR of the prostein mRNA required for translational repression. Transfection of synthetic miR-126* into prostate cancer LNCaP cells strongly reduced the translation of prostein. Interestingly, loss of prostein correlated with reduction of LNCaP cell migration and invasion. Thus, the robust expression of prostein protein in the prostate cells results from a combination of transcriptional activation of the prostein gene and absence of intronic miRNA-126* due to the prostate-specific repression of the Egfl7 gene. We conclude that intronic miRNAs from tissue-specific transcripts, or their natural absence, make cardinal contributions to cellular gene expression and phenotype. These findings also open the door to tissue-specific miRNA therapy.

show abstract

“…miRs guide the pairing of miRISC, with imperfect complementarity, to sequences in target mRNAs, thus resulting in their subsequent destabilization and translational repression of the target 3 . The 'seed sequence' , at nucleotides 2-8, is a key determinant for miRISC-target recognition 4,5 . Recent data have shown that 35-40% of miR-binding sites are found in 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs), 40-50% in coding regions and <5% in 5′-UTR regions of mRNAs 6,7 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

miR-128 represses L1 retrotransposition by binding directly to L1 RNA

Hamdorf

Idica

Zisoulis

et al. 2015

Nat Struct Mol Biol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

VOLUME 22 NUMBER 10 OCTOBER 2015 nature structural & molecular biology a r t i c l e s microRNAs (miRs) are a class of small (~22-nt) genomically encoded molecules that inhibit translational initiation and stimulate decay of mRNA targets 1,2 . miRs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II and processed by the RNase III enzymes-Dicer and Drosha with its binding partner, DGCR8-to produce short double-stranded RNAs in the nucleus. One strand associates with the Argonaute (Ago) protein, thus forming the miR-mediated silencing complex (miRISC). miRs guide the pairing of miRISC, with imperfect complementarity, to sequences in target mRNAs, thus resulting in their subsequent destabilization and translational repression of the target 3 . The 'seed sequence' , at nucleotides 2-8, is a key determinant for miRISC-target recognition 4,5 . Recent data have shown that 35-40% of miR-binding sites are found in 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs), 40-50% in coding regions and <5% in 5′-UTR regions of mRNAs 6,7 . More than 60% of the human transcriptome has been predicted to be under miR regulation, thus making this post-transcriptional control pathway as important as protein pathways in the regulation of cell functions 2 . It is clear that miRs have essential roles in regulating diverse functions in normal and diseased cells 8,9 .L1 belongs to the most abundant class of autonomous transposable elements 10 . Human L1 contains two open reading frames, ORF1 and ORF2, which encode a protein with RNA-binding and nucleotide acid-chaperone activity (ORF1) 11 and a protein with endonuclease and reverse-transcriptase activities (ORF2) 12-15 , respectively. L1 mobilizes replicatively from one location in the genome to another by a 'copy-and-paste' mechanism, and it has been proposed to be a remnant of an ancient retrovirus 12,16 . Active and inactive L1s have been implicated in the evolution of mammalian genomes and are linked to cell-based diseases, including cancer [17][18][19] . In addition, somatic L1 insertions are biased toward regions of cancer-specific DNA hypomethylation, thus suggesting that L1 insertions may provide a selective advantage during tumorigenesis 20 . Mechanisms that operate at different levels in gene-expression hierarchies have been selected to control transposition-mediated mutagenesis and mitigate the potential negative effects of newly inserted elements. In germ cells, a specific small-RNA subtype (piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs)) efficiently counteracts L1 activity, but these RNAs are not expressed in nongerm cells 21,22 . Somatic cells attenuate element mobilization by DNA methylation of the L1 promoter 23 . Other methods of regulation are mediated by APOBEC proteins 24,25 , microprocessor interactions 26 and Ago-mediated RNA interference in mouse embryonic stem cells 27 . L1-promoter silencing is greatly attenuated, and L1 transcription is reactivated in hypomethylated cells, such as cancer cells and tumor-initiating cells, and is also reactivated during reprogramming [28][29][30] . Because miRs act as regulators of g...

show abstract

Cell-type-specific signatures of microRNAs on target mRNA expression

Cited by 596 publications

References 27 publications

Beyond early development: Xenopus as an emerging model for the study of regenerative mechanisms

Beyond early development: Xenopus as an emerging model for the study of regenerative mechanisms

Ectopic expression of miR-126*, an intronic product of the vascular endothelial EGF-like 7 gene, regulates prostein translation and invasiveness of prostate cancer LNCaP cells

miR-128 represses L1 retrotransposition by binding directly to L1 RNA

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About