Aims TeleCheck-AF is a multicentre international project initiated to maintain care delivery for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) during COVID-19 through teleconsultations supported by an on-demand photoplethysmography-based heart rate and rhythm monitoring app (FibriCheck®). We describe the characteristics, inclusion rates, and experiences from participating centres according the TeleCheck-AF infrastructure as well as characteristics and experiences from recruited patients. Methods and results Three surveys exploring centre characteristics (n = 25), centre experiences (n = 23), and patient experiences (n = 826) were completed. Self-reported patient characteristics were obtained from the app. Most centres were academic (64%) and specialized public cardiology/district hospitals (36%). Majority of the centres had AF outpatient clinics (64%) and only 36% had AF ablation clinics. The time required to start patient inclusion and total number of included patients in the project was comparable for centres experienced (56%) or inexperienced in mHealth use. Within 28 weeks, 1930 AF patients were recruited, mainly for remote AF control (31% of patients) and AF ablation follow-up (42%). Average inclusion rate was highest during the lockdown restrictions and reached a steady state at a lower level after easing the restrictions (188 vs. 52 weekly recruited patients). Majority (>80%) of the centres reported no problems during the implementation of the TeleCheck-AF approach. Recruited patients [median age 64 (55–71), 62% male] agreed that the FibriCheck® app was easy to use (94%). Conclusion Despite different health care settings and mobile health experiences, the TeleCheck-AF approach could be set up within an extremely short time and easily used in different European centres during COVID-19.

Autoimmune diseases (ADs) affect approximately 10% of the world's population. Because ADs are frequently systemic disorders, cardiac involvement is common. In this review we focus on typical arrhythmias and their pathogenesis, arrhythmia-associated mortality, and possible treatment options among selected ADs (sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, type 1 diabetes, Graves' disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis [AS], psoriasis, celiac disease [CD], and inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]). Rhythm disorders have different underlying pathophysiologies; myocardial inflammation and fibrosis seem to be the most important factors. Inflammatory processes and oxidative stress lead to cardiomyocyte necrosis, with subsequent electrical and structural remodeling. Furthermore, chronic inflammation is the pathophysiological basis linking AD to autonomic dysfunction, including sympathetic overactivation and a decline in parasympathetic function. Autoantibody-mediated inhibitory effects of cellular events (i.e., potassium or L-type calcium currents, M2 muscarinic cholinergic or β1-adrenergic receptor signaling) can also lead to cardiac arrhythmia. Drug-induced arrhythmias, caused, for example, by corticosteroids, methotrexate, chloroquine, are also observed among AD patients. The most common arrhythmia in most AD presentations is atrial arrhythmia (primarily atrial fibrillation), expect for sarcoidosis and scleroderma, which are characterized by a higher burden of ventricular arrhythmia. Arrhythmia-associated mortality is highest among patients with sarcoidosis and lowest among those with AS; there are scant data related to mortality in patients with psoriasis, CD, and IBD.

No abstract

BackgroundGenome-wide studies have shown that polymorphisms on chromosome 4q25, 16q22 and 1q21 correlate with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the distribution of these polymorphisms differs significantly among populations.ObjectiveTo test the polymorphisms on chromosome 4q25, 16q22 and 1q21 in a group of patients (pts) that underwent catheter ablation of AF.MethodsFour hundred and ten patients with AF that underwent pulmonary vein isolation were included in the study. Control group (n = 550) was taken from healthy population, matched for age, sex and presence of hypertension. All participants were genotyped for the presence of the rs2200733, rs10033464, rs17570669, rs3853445, rs6838973 (4q25), rs7193343 (16q22) and rs13376333 (1q21) polymorphisms.ResultsAll the polymorphisms tested (except rs17570669) correlated significantly with AF in univariate analysis (p values between 0.039 for rs7193343 and 2.7e-27 for rs2200733), with the odds ratio (OR) 0.572 and 0.617 for rs3853445 and rs6838973, respectively (protective role) and OR 1.268 to 3.52 for the other polymorphisms. All 4q25 SNPs tested but rs3853445 were independently linked with AF in multivariate logistic regression analysis. In haplotype analysis six out of nine 4q25 haplotypes were significantly linked with AF. The T allele of rs2200733 favoured increased number of episodes of AF per month (p = 0.045) and larger pulmonary vein diameter (recessive model, p = 0.032).ConclusionsPatients qualified for catheter ablation of AF have a significantly higher frequency of 4q25, 16q22 and 1q21 variants than the control group. The T allele of rs2200733 favours larger pulmonary veins and increased number of episodes of AF.

Background: The aims of the study are 1) to assess antiarrhythmic prophylaxis efficacy during the first 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (ARF) sustain SR were: males (82.9% vs. 62.2%; p = 0.018), younger patients (44.8 ± 12.7 vs. 52.5 ± 9.9; p = 0.0001), patients with smaller left atrium diameter (4.05 ± ± 0.49 cm vs. 4.25 ± 0.51 cm; p = 0.04), and those without any AF recurrence during the first 2 months after ARF (78.7% vs. 35.6%; p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, the independent risk factors for LAFR were hypertension (p < 0.001) and persistent AF (p = 0.014). Conclusions: Antiarrhythmic prophylaxis does not affect the number of AF recurrences during the first 2 months after ablation. SR maintenance during a blanking period after AF ablation is a positive prognostic factor in long-term follow-up. Persistent AF and hypertension are independent risk factors for late AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation. (Cardiol J 2014; 21, 4: 384-391)