Cardiac output measured by NICOM had most often acceptable accuracy, precision, and responsiveness in a wide range of circulatory situations.

In this specific population of patients, it is clinically valid to use the bioreactance-based NICOM system to predict FR from changes in CO during PLR.

The contribution of ventilator circuit bacterial contamination to the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia remains controversial. In a previous study, we found that the incidence of pneumonia was identical with ventilator circuit changes every 48 h and with no ventilator circuit changes. The present study prospectively assessed whether keeping ventilator circuits clean with a heat and moisture exchanger exhibiting antimicrobial barrier properties affects patient colonization and the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h. Consecutive patients were randomly allocated to humidification with either a heat and moisture exchanger (Group 1, n = 61) or a heated humidifier (Group 2, n = 70). In both groups, no circuit changes were performed throughout ventilatory support. Duration of mechanical ventilation was identical in both groups (10 +/- 8.6 d (range: 2 to 47) in Group 1 and 12.5 +/- 14.2 d [range: 2 to 85] in Group 2). The incidence of pneumonia (positive quantitative culture of protected brush specimen) was similar in both groups (6/61 and 8/70 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively; p = 0.8), as was duration of ventilation prior to pneumonia (9 +/- 5.9 versus 8.2 +/- 5.7 d; p = 0.8). Ventilator tubing contamination was considerably reduced with the use of a heat and moisture exchanger. In contrast, bacterial colonization of the pharynx and trachea was identical in both groups. These results suggest that circuit colonization plays little or no role in the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, provided usual maintenance precautions are applied.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Introduction This study was designed to test the hypothesis of equivalence in cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) monitoring capabilities of two devices: non invasive transthoracic bioreactance (NICOM), and a pulse contour analysis (PICCO PC) coupled to transpulmonary thermodilution (PICCO TD).

Heat and moisture exchangers (HME) (Dar-Hygrobac II, Peters) can safely be used every 24 h for long-term mechanical ventilation and provide a cost-saving alternative to heated humidifiers. We have prospectively determined whether changing HMEs every 48 h only affects their clinical and bacteriological efficiency in a series of consecutive nonselected ICU patients requiring long-term mechanical ventilation. Two consecutive periods were compared. During period 1, HMEs were replaced every day; during period 2, they were changed every 48 h. Patients from the two periods were similar in terms of age and indication for and overall duration of MV (10 +/- 8.6 versus 10 +/- 9 d, p = 0.9). Minute ventilation and maximum values for peak airway pressure were identical during the two periods. These values were also identical after 1 and 2 d of HME use during period 2, indicating that HME resistance was not increased by prolonged use. Obstruction of the tracheal tube occurred only once in a period 1 patient. The results of quantitative cultures indicate that the maximum and mean levels of bacterial colonization during the two periods were similar for the pharynx, trachea, Y-connector, patient, and ventilator side of the HME. More importantly, the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia was similar during the two periods (6/61 versus 8/68, p = 0.7). Thus, prolonged HME use is safe and provides a substantial reduction in the cost of mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after aortic valve replacement by rapid-deployment bioprosthesis (RDB) and standard valve (Standard). METHODS All patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between 2015 and 2018, in 1 centre, were included. A multivariate analysis on the whole cohort and then a propensity score matching were used to compare the 2 groups. The primary end point was PPM implantation. RESULTS We studied 924 patients (256 RDBs and 668 Standards). Overall, 67 PPM were implanted, 37 (14.5%) in the RDB group and 26 (3.9%) in the Standard group (P < 0.0001, univariate analysis). The multivariate analysis in the unmatched population found 4 independent factors associated with PPM implantation: right bundle branch block with odds ratios (ORs 3.7, 95% CI 2.9–6.7; P < 0.0001), RDB (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.0–6.2; P < 0.0001), age (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0–1.1; P < 0.006) and endocarditis (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.0–11.0; P < 0.04). In the propensity score-matched RDB group (203 patients per group), 25 patients required PPM implantation versus 3 in the Standard group (12.3% vs 1.5%, P < 0.0001). RDBs also had more postoperative left bundle branch block and new onset of atrial fibrillation (30.2% vs 5.1%, P < 0.0001 and 34.0% vs 24.1%, P = 0.029). RDBs had lower operating times (in min): aortic cross-clamping = 62 (44–76.5) vs 72 (57.5–91.5) and cardiopulmonary bypass = 81 (63–98.5) vs 91 (75–112), P < 0.0001. There was no significant difference in other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS RDBs were associated with reduced operating times, increased risk of atrial fibrillation and PPM implantation as compared with standard aortic valves.

No abstract

No abstract