In this article, I analyze how ideas of attachment to place and the experience of political and economic marginality combine to produce a particular moral geography for people of the Manambondro region of southeast Madagascar. Though the elements of this moral geography comprise an archive of sorts of the colonial encounter, they also speak of people's consciousness of their marginality within the postcolonial present. I argue that moral geography represents a structure of feeling, a form of social consciousness that captures something profound about people's senses of place and also, regarding their ambivalence toward modernity, their sense of who they are and who they might become, [colonialism, modernity, moral geography, place, postcolonialism, structure of feeling, Madagascar]On an overcast afternoon in mid-1992, I stood next to Kotozaka, watching the events held to commemorate and honor a deceased elder of the village of Manambondro in southeast Madagascar. At one point, Kotozaka turned to me and said, "Fomba gasy-ohatran'ne biby. Ratsy he fomba doboky. Misy depense be" [This is Malagasy custom-just like animals. Funerary customs are bad. There is great expense]. Did we vazaha (foreigners) do such things, he asked, did we kill cattle when an old man died? 1 "No/' I said, "We don't kill cattle, though we do spend a lot of money on a funeral," and I proceeded to elaborate on the nature of "our customs." When I had finished, Kotozaka turned to me and said, "Tsara-tsara nandroso" [Good-it is good to be developed].Kotozaka's remarks were not the only time I encountered debates over differences of custom and issues of what it is to be developed played out in relation to the dead. One day, news reached Manambondro that Neny, a woman from a nearby village who had lived for many years in the capital of Madagascar, had died and that her body was being returned to her ancestral homeland (tanin-drazana) for burial. The news prompted discussion between Neny's relatives on her father's and mother's side, and it was agreed that the funeral would be hosted by the mother's group. A couple of days later, a truck arrived bearing Neny's brother, several relatives on her father's side, and Neny's corpse in a casket. No sooner had the casket arrived than an argument broke out between Neny's brother and people of his (and Neny's) mother's group. The brother demanded that the funeral should be conducted in his own village (that of Neny's father's group) rather than in the mother's village, this despite the fact that the elders of the father's group had already agreed that the mother's group would host the funeral. The argument continued for much of the night, and early next morning senior members of Neny's father's group arrived to try and resolve the situation.American Ethnologist29 (2):366-391. Copyright©