1998
DOI: 10.2307/3034155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conspicuous Construction: Houses, Consumption and 'Relocalization' in Manambondro, Southeast Madagascar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Waterson 1990, 138-166;Kuper 1993;Carsten/Hugh-Jones 1995b;Green 1999. 19 Sellato 1987Waterson 1995;Carsten/Hugh-Jones 1995a, 10;P. Thomas 1996.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waterson 1990, 138-166;Kuper 1993;Carsten/Hugh-Jones 1995b;Green 1999. 19 Sellato 1987Waterson 1995;Carsten/Hugh-Jones 1995a, 10;P. Thomas 1996.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of 'conspicuous construction' that I take from Philip Thomas (1998) signals my understanding that the decision to expand the house was kar i te l l e motivated by a concern with status. Several factors make 'modern' houses suitable for making claims to status through construction.…”
Section: Compatibility and Conspicuous Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effort and money invested into building 'modern' homes, with associated changes in design and in the use of space, invite an examination of the house as a symbolic category and how these ideas may be changing. To account for the current inclination for 'conspicuous construction' (Thomas 1998), I stress how the economic aspects of houses connect to the fact that distinctions of hereditary rank have long been objectifi ed in Sasak vernacular architecture. While 'modern' houses are ideally suited for signifying status and wealth, it is the pragmatic role of the house as a vehicle for refl exivity and social action, which lies at the heart of this article.…”
Section: Engaging Housesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, sending communities have become linked to the global economy through economic restructuring and capitalist expansion as well as migration, which "has also inadvertently redefined local definitions of wealth and status" (Pribilsky 2007, 11). House construction itself may represent an individual and status-building endeavor (Melly 2010;Pellow 2003;Thomas 1998). Thus, at the community and national levels, remittances are the subject of debates over solidarity, national development, and belonging.…”
Section: The Contradictions Of Transnational Lifementioning
confidence: 99%