Women are under-represented in academic medicine. We reviewed the empirical evidence focusing on the reasons for women's choice or rejection of careers in academic medicine. Using a systematic search, we identified 52 studies published between 1985, and 2015. More than half had methodological limitations and most were from North America. Eight main themes were explored in these studies. There was consistent evidence for four of these themes: women are interested in teaching more than in research; participation in research can encourage women into academic medicine; women lack adequate mentors and role models; and women experience gender discrimination and bias. The evidence was conflicting on four themes: women are less interested in research than men; women lose commitment to research as their education and training progress; women are deterred from academic careers by financial considerations; and women are deterred by concerns about work-life balance. Inconsistency of findings across studies suggests significant opportunities to overcome barriers by providing a more enabling environment. We identified substantial gaps in the scientific literature that could form the focus of future research, including shifting the focus from individuals' career choices to the societal and organisational contexts and cultures within which those choices are made; extending the evidence base to include a wider range of countries and settings; and testing the efficacy of interventions.
The prevalence and pattern of mucosal involvement in 121 patients with lupus erythematosus (LE) was investigated. Fifty-three patients had systemic LE (SLE) and 68 patients had chronic cutaneous LE (CCLE). Twenty-one per cent (11/53) of patients with SLE and 24% (16/68) of patients with CCLE had signs of mucosal involvement, but the pattern of involvement differed in the two groups. Nasal mucosal lesions were a feature in 2% (I/53) of patients with SLE and 9% (6/68) of patients with CCLE. Hyperkeratotic lichen planus-like plaques on buccal mucosa and the palate occurred in 9% (6/68) of patients with CCLE and 4% (2/53) of patients with SLE. Episcleritis occurred in 9% (5/53) of patients with SLE and not seen in CCLE. Erythematous plaques on the lower eyelids were present in 6% (4/68) of patients with CCLE and these were associated with conjunctival scarring in two patients. Vulval lesions were present in 5% (2/42) of female patients with CCLE. Oral plaques may occur when the disease is relatively quiescent elsewhere. The prevalence of mucosal involvement in lupus is underestimated as the lesions may be asymptomatic.
Clinical and immunopathological studies of three patients with lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP) were carried out to investigate the relationship between LPP and bullous pemphigoid (BP) and to determine whether the antigen in LPP is the classical BP antigen. LPP is usually considered to be the coexistence of lichen planus with BP. The bullae in LPP were subepidermal and indistinguishable from BP. Indirect immunofluorescence demonstrated antibody binding to the epidermal surface of 1 M NaCl-split skin and mucosae, as in BP. The tissue distribution of the LPP antigen mirrored the distribution of BP in stratified squamous epithelia but was absent from transitional epithelia (pig bladder). Immunoelectron microscopy, both direct (two cases) and indirect (one case), showed binding to the lamina lucida as with BP antigen. Western blotting of epidermal extracts using the patients' sera showed that instead of reacting with the classical bullous pemphigoid antigen (220 kDa in our series), the antisera reacted with a unique band of 200 kDa in addition to the band of 180 kDa found as a minor antigen in bullous pemphigoid, but more commonly in pemphigoid gestationis. The relationship between these antigens awaits molecular characterization. These findings suggest that the target antigen in LPP may be unique.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.