Laryngeal cryptococcosis is a rare clinical entity. There have been a limited number of case reports in the literature with no consensus regarding optimal management. This review contributes two additional case reports of immunocompetent patients with cryptococcal infection of the larynx in whom exposure to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids is proposed as a significant risk factor. Twenty cases were identified from review of the literature. All patients presented with hoarseness and a spectrum of microlaryngoscopic features, often mimicking laryngeal malignancy. The majority of cases were treated with systemic antifungal therapy, three cases had surgical excision alone, and another three had a combination of medical and surgical management. Risk factor modification, in the form of a reduction in inhaled corticosteroid was employed in the two new cases, and in some previously published cases. Risk factor modification, such as reduction of inhaled corticosteroid dose, in addition to oral antifungal agents can be effective in managing cryptococcal laryngitis.
This Australian multicenter study of ILI is the largest reported to date. ILI is a useful technique that can be safely and effectively performed across tertiary referral centers for the successful management of advanced extremity melanoma. Increased optimization of perioperative factors might allow response rates to be raised further, while maintaining acceptable toxicity.
The ability to learn and rehearse surgical procedures in a safe environment is invaluable, particularly for delicate and highly technical phonomicrosurgical operations. We have developed a high-fidelity laryngeal surgical simulator complete with pathological lesions such as nodules and keratoses to teach these procedures. A prospective study demonstrated validity of our global rating scale and checklist assessments for vocal fold nodule and keratosis excision procedures, allowing them to be confidently incorporated into phonomicrosurgical training programs for surgeons of all levels of expertise.
Objective To determine whether exposing junior doctors to Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) improves their telephone referrals. SBAR is a standardised minimum information communication tool. Methods A randomised controlled trial with participants and rating clinicians both blinded to group allocation. Hospital interns from a 2-year period (2006e2007) participated in two simulated clinical scenarios which required them to make telephone referrals. The intervention group was educated in SBAR between scenarios. Pre and post intervention telephone referrals were recorded, scored and compared. Six-month followup and year group comparisons were also made. An objective rating score measured the presence of specific 'critical data' communication elements on a scale of 1e12. Qualitative measures of global rating scores and participant self-rated scoring of performance were recorded. Time to 'first pitch' (the intern's initial speech) was also recorded. Results Data were available for 66 interns out of 91 eligible. SBAR exposure did not increase the number of communication elements presented; objective rating scores were 8.5 (IQ 7.0e9.0) for SBAR and 8.0 (IQ 6.5e8.0) for the control group (p¼0.051). Median global rating scores, designed to measure 'call impact', were higher following SBAR exposure (SBAR: 3.0 (IQR 2.0e4.0); control: 2.0 (IQ 1.0e3.0); p¼0.003)). Global rating scores improved as time to 'first pitch' duration decreased (p¼0.001). SBAR exposure did not improve time to 'first pitch' duration. Conclusion In this simulated setting exposure to SBAR did not improve telephone referral performance by increasing the amount of critical information presented, despite the fact that it is a minimum data element tool. SBAR did improve the 'call impact' of the telephone referral as measured by qualitative global rating scores.
In this cohort with suspected inducible laryngeal obstruction and asthma, 42% had objective evidence of both conditions. Clinical assessment, questionnaire scores and comorbidity burden were not sufficiently discriminatory for diagnosis, highlighting the necessity of objective diagnostic testing.
Paddle, MBBS(Hons), FRACS Objectives/Hypothesis: Serial intralesional steroid injection (SILSI) has recently been proposed as an effective scarmodifying therapy for subglottic stenosis (SGS). We aimed to explore the systemic absorption of steroid following SILSI and to characterize the magnitude and chronicity of any effect observed. Specifically, we aimed to show that any effect resolves prior to the next intralesional injection.Study Design: Prospective, observational pilot study. Methods: Patients were injected intralesionally with 40 to 200 mg triamcinolone. Serum cortisol, as well as white cell counts and inflammatory markers were measured at day 0 (baseline), 1, 7, and 28. Salivary cortisol was measured at baseline and for 7 consecutive days following injection.Results: Six patients with idiopathic SGS were recruited. At baseline, serum cortisol measured 284.0 AE 61.4 nmol/L and fell significantly to 15.5 AE 4.3 nmol/L 1 day following triamcinolone injection (P = .03). At day 7, serum steroid levels showed significant recovery to 221.8 AE 78.9 nmol/L (P = .03) and further rose to 279.5 AE 29.9 nmol/L at 28 days (P = .07). Salivary cortisol exhibited a similar pattern with significant recovery by day 6 (P = .04) and suggestion of exponential clearance of triamcinolone systemically. White cell counts were also affected by systemic absorption of exogenous steroid. No significant change in inflammatory markers was observed.Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate systemic absorption of steroid following SILSI, with acute hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis suppression. However, normalization of HPA axis function by day 7 suggests that although acute steroid side effects should be discussed with patients, no cumulative systemic steroid side effect would occur with serial injections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.