2015
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4969-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Australian Multicenter Study of Isolated Limb Infusion for Melanoma

Abstract: This Australian multicenter study of ILI is the largest reported to date. ILI is a useful technique that can be safely and effectively performed across tertiary referral centers for the successful management of advanced extremity melanoma. Increased optimization of perioperative factors might allow response rates to be raised further, while maintaining acceptable toxicity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ORR of 86.6% is also favorable when compared with other IL therapies such as Bacille Calmette‐Guerin (BCG) immunotherapy (ORR 45%) and Talimogene Laherparepvec (T‐VEC), a herpes simplex virus type 1‐derived oncolytic immunotherapy (ORR 26.4%) . The overall response rate obtained in this study was similar to following isolated limb infusion (ORR 75%) and isolated limb perfusion (ORR 90%), accepting that these patients often have more extensive and bulky disease . Objectively, this treatment appeared to produce inferior results in terms of complete response and time to local progression compared to ILP .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The ORR of 86.6% is also favorable when compared with other IL therapies such as Bacille Calmette‐Guerin (BCG) immunotherapy (ORR 45%) and Talimogene Laherparepvec (T‐VEC), a herpes simplex virus type 1‐derived oncolytic immunotherapy (ORR 26.4%) . The overall response rate obtained in this study was similar to following isolated limb infusion (ORR 75%) and isolated limb perfusion (ORR 90%), accepting that these patients often have more extensive and bulky disease . Objectively, this treatment appeared to produce inferior results in terms of complete response and time to local progression compared to ILP .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The limitation of the maximum temperature and the reduction of the rhTNFα dose, perfusion time, and perfused limb volume result in less systemic and local toxicity. In effect, the proportion of toxic grade III or IV reactions according to Wieberdink after ILPs with rhTNFα and melphalan is roughly equal to the toxicity of isolated limb infusion (ILI) with melphalan alone (Table ). TNF‐ILP is a neoadjuvant procedure. The understanding of destroying the sarcoma by destroying its vasculature is the key element of success.…”
Section: Current Standards In Tnf‐ilpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ILI is a form of regional limb chemotherapy developed in Sydney, Australia . A less invasive alternative to HILP, the procedure is also technically less challenging and has a reduced periprocedural morbidity profile . The results of our analysis reporting an ORR of 62% and local progression rate of 19% may underrepresent the true treatment outcomes as clinical assessments in examined studies were generally 3 months postintervention rather than at the time of the last follow‐up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Table summarizes the key data for each modality and presents the pooled results including the weighted ORR and meta‐analysis data. Assessed studies included: randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized phase I and II comparative and noncomparative studies, and prospective or retrospective case series (NHMRC levels II–IV evidence; Tables S2‐S9) . Only two therapies: amputation and topical imiquimod, were suitable for formal meta‐analysis ( I 2 value ≤ 40%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%