We evaluated a novel octylcyanoacrylate-based liquid occlusive dressing for partial-thickness wounds. One hundred and fifteen standardized wounds were created with an electric dermatome set at a depth of 600 micro on the flanks of three pigs and randomly treated with liquid occlusive dressing, a hydrocolloid dressing, or gauze. In one pig, wounds were swabbed with Staphylococcus aureus. Biopsies were taken after 4, 5, 6, and 21 days. Hemostasis was obtained in all wounds treated with the liquid occlusive. The percent reepithelialization of wounds treated with the liquid occlusive and hydrocolloid dressings were significantly greater at days 4 and 5 than control wounds (78% and 82% vs. 40%, p < 0.001 and 99% and 100% vs. 72%, p < 0.001, respectively). None of the liquid occlusive-treated wounds challenged with bacteria became infected. Foreign body reactions were least common in wounds treated with the liquid occlusive (p < 0.001). Scar depth was less for liquid occlusive- and hydrocolloid-treated wounds than controls (285 micro and 303 micro vs. 490 micro, p < 0.001). We conclude that excisional wounds treated with the liquid occlusive dressing reepithelialize as quickly as hydrocolloid-treated wounds. The liquid occlusive dressing is an effective microbial barrier and hemostatic agent resulting in fewer foreign body reactions than hydrocolloid-treated wounds or controls.
2004) Comparison of woundbursting strengths and surface characteristics of FDA-approved tissue adhesives for skin closure , Abstract-We compared the wound-bursting strength (WBS), mode of adhesive failure and surface characteristicsof two FDA-approved tissue adhesives for skin closure in an incisional rat model using a randomized, controlled, blind animal experiment. Standardized 2-cm full-thickness incisions were made in duplicate on both sides of 15 rats and closed with Indermil, or High Viscosity Dermabond (HVD) following manufacturers' instructions. WBS was measured 5 min later with a validated commercial instrument. Wound sections were also observed under light and scanning electron microscopies. Indermil was signi cantly weaker than HVD (mean difference, 143 mmHg; 95% CI, 42-229 mmHg, P D 0:002). The mode of failure for Indermil was primarily cohesive in the adhesive and the primary failure mode for the HVD was interfacial (Â 2 , P < 0:01). Microscopic observations demonstrated that application of HVD resulted in a thick, uniform and smooth surface while Indermil resulted in a thin, irregular, cracked surface. We conclude that HVD is stronger, thicker and more uniform than Indermil.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.