Covid-19 has impacted millions of people and may disproportionately affect those with hypertension and diabetes. Due to inadequate methods in published systematic reviews, the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension and associated risks of poor outcomes in Covid-19 patients are unknown. We searched, databases from December 1, 2019 to April 6, 2020 and selected observational peer-reviewed studies in English language of patients with Covid-19. Independent reviewers extracted data on study participants, interventions, and outcomes and assessed risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence using the. We included 65 (15,794 participants) observational studies at moderate-to-high risk of bias. Overall prevalence of diabetes and hypertension was 12% (95% CI 10-15%, n=12870, I2: 89%), and 17% (95% CI 13-22%, n=12709, I2: 95%), respectively. In severe Covid-19, the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension were 18% (95% CI 16-20%, n=1099, I2: 0%) and 32% (95% CI 16-54%, n=1078, I2: 63%), respectively. Unadjusted relative risk for ICU admission and mortality were 1.96 (95% CI 1.19-3.22, n=8,890, I2: 80%, p=.008) and 2.78 (95% CI 1.39-5.58, n=2058, I2: 75%, p=.0004) for diabetics; and 2.95 (95% CI 2.18-3.99, n=1737, I2: 0%, p<.001) and 2.39 (95% CI 1.54-3.73, n=3107, I2: 66%, p<.001) for hypertensives. Neither diabetes (1.50, 95% CI 0.90-2.50, n=1991, I2: 74%, p=.119) nor hypertension (1.48, 95% CI 0.99-2.23, n=2023, I2: 69%, p=.058) was associated with severe Covid-19. In conclusion, the risk of ICU admission and mortality for patients with diabetes or hypertension who developed Covid-19 is increased compared to those without these comorbidities.

No abstract

Epignathus is a rare congenital orofacial teratoma that arises from the sphenoid region of the palate or the pharynx. It occurs in approximately 1:35,000 to 1:200,000 live births representing 2% to 9% of all teratomas. We present the case of a newborn of 39.4 weeks of gestation with a tumor that occupied the entire oral cavity. The patient was delivered by cesarean section. Oral resection was managed by pediatric surgery. Plastic surgery used virtual 3-dimensional models to establish the extension, and depth of the tumor. Bloc resection and reconstruction of the epignathus were performed. The mass was diagnosed as a mature teratoma associated with cleft lip and palate, nasoethmoidal meningocele that conditions hypertelorism, and a pseudomacrostoma. Tridimensional technology was applied to plan the surgical intervention. It contributed to a better understanding of the relationships between the tumor and the adjacent structures. This optimized the surgical approach and outcome.

No abstract

AimThe aim of this study was to systematically appraise the quality of a sample of COVID-19-related systematic reviews (SRs) and discuss internal validity threats affecting the COVID-19 body of evidence.DesignWe conducted a scoping review of the literature. SRs with or without meta-analysis (MA) that evaluated clinical data, outcomes or treatments for patients with COVID-19 were included.Main outcome measuresWe extracted quality characteristics guided by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 to calculate a qualitative score. Complementary evaluation of the most prominent published limitations affecting the COVID-19 body of evidence was performed.ResultsA total of 63 SRs were included. The majority were judged as a critically low methodological quality. Most of the studies were not guided by a pre-established protocol (39, 62%). More than half (39, 62%) failed to address risk of bias when interpreting their results. A comprehensive literature search strategy was reported in most SRs (54, 86%). Appropriate use of statistical methods was evident in nearly all SRs with MAs (39, 95%). Only 16 (33%) studies recognised heterogeneity in the definition of severe COVID-19 as a limitation of the study, and 15 (24%) recognised repeated patient populations as a limitation.ConclusionThe methodological and reporting quality of current COVID-19 SR is far from optimal. In addition, most of the current SRs fail to address relevant threats to their internal validity, including repeated patients and heterogeneity in the definition of severe COVID-19. Adherence to proper study design and peer-review practices must remain to mitigate current limitations.