Benefits and Harms of Levothyroxine/L-Triiodothyronine Versus Levothyroxine Monotherapy for Adult Patients with Hypothyroidism: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
“…Compared with the various uncertainties of the combination therapy, the advantages of T4 monotherapy are obvious: long halflife, low cost, convenient monitoring, T4 conversion outside the thyroid gland to T3 provides continuous T3 production, and the once daily dose is sufficient. 4 However, consistent with the previous study, 6 our results showed that patients preferred the combination therapy. Given the double-blind process applied in the included studies, it is difficult to attribute this phenomenon to the influence of external environment rather than subjective feelings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy was more commonly preferred by the patients and did not increase the risk of cardiovascular side effects. The results further confirmed the conclusions of previous metaanalyses [6][7][8] and provided sufficient evidence that T4 monotherapy should be viewed as the first choice for patients with overt hypothyroidism. This is because whether the combination therapy has objective advantages remains to be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The clinical trial by Bunevicius et al 15 showed a significant improvement in the psychological health of patients receiving the combination therapy. However, most follow‐up clinical trials and meta‐analyses, 6–8 including the present meta‐analysis, could not replicate this result. The reasons for this difference may be as follows: first, the awareness of a chronic disease requiring lifelong treatment and follow‐up may affect patients' moods 31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…4 However, some patients experience hypothyroid symptoms despite having normal TSH levels, and adjusting the dose of LT4 slightly helped in improving psychological health. 4,5 Although most previous studies and metaanalysis [6][7][8] showed disappointing results of the combination therapy in improving psychological health, patients' preference for combination therapy is evident. 9 We speculate that the methodological heterogeneity of included clinical studies in previous meta-analysis may have obscured the subtle advantages of combination therapy.…”
Purpose
To evaluate whether T4 + T3 combination therapy had advantages in improving psychological health compared with T4 monotherapy.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 2000 to March 2021, and updated in September 2021. The inclusion criteria (prospective study, published in English, had a T4 + T3 combination therapy test group and a T4 monotherapy control group, patients aged ≥18 years and with overt primary hypothyroidism, and published after January 2000) were applied by two reviewers; any disagreement was resolved by a third reviewer. The two reviewers independently extracted data using a standard data form and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Coprimary outcomes included the psychological health measures of depression, fatigue, pain, anxiety and anger, measured using validated and reliable instruments.
Results
Eighteen of 2029 studies (883 patients) were included in the meta‐analysis. No significant difference was found between T4 + T3 combination therapy and T4 monotherapy with regard to depression (standardized mean difference [SMD]: −0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.18; 0.07), fatigue (SMD: 0.06, 95% CI: −0.13; 0.26), pain (SMD: −0.01, 95% CI: −0.24; 0.22), anxiety (SMD: 0.01, 95% CI: −0.15; 0.17) and anger (SMD: 0.05, 95% CI: −0.15; 0.24). Methodological heterogeneity had no influence on the results. The patients preferred combination therapy significantly.
Conclusions
Compared with T4 monotherapy, T4 + T3 combination therapy had no significant advantage in improving psychological health. For patients who are unsatisfied with LT4 monotherapy, the patient and the physician should make a joint decision concerning therapy.
“…Compared with the various uncertainties of the combination therapy, the advantages of T4 monotherapy are obvious: long halflife, low cost, convenient monitoring, T4 conversion outside the thyroid gland to T3 provides continuous T3 production, and the once daily dose is sufficient. 4 However, consistent with the previous study, 6 our results showed that patients preferred the combination therapy. Given the double-blind process applied in the included studies, it is difficult to attribute this phenomenon to the influence of external environment rather than subjective feelings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy was more commonly preferred by the patients and did not increase the risk of cardiovascular side effects. The results further confirmed the conclusions of previous metaanalyses [6][7][8] and provided sufficient evidence that T4 monotherapy should be viewed as the first choice for patients with overt hypothyroidism. This is because whether the combination therapy has objective advantages remains to be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The clinical trial by Bunevicius et al 15 showed a significant improvement in the psychological health of patients receiving the combination therapy. However, most follow‐up clinical trials and meta‐analyses, 6–8 including the present meta‐analysis, could not replicate this result. The reasons for this difference may be as follows: first, the awareness of a chronic disease requiring lifelong treatment and follow‐up may affect patients' moods 31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…4 However, some patients experience hypothyroid symptoms despite having normal TSH levels, and adjusting the dose of LT4 slightly helped in improving psychological health. 4,5 Although most previous studies and metaanalysis [6][7][8] showed disappointing results of the combination therapy in improving psychological health, patients' preference for combination therapy is evident. 9 We speculate that the methodological heterogeneity of included clinical studies in previous meta-analysis may have obscured the subtle advantages of combination therapy.…”
Purpose
To evaluate whether T4 + T3 combination therapy had advantages in improving psychological health compared with T4 monotherapy.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 2000 to March 2021, and updated in September 2021. The inclusion criteria (prospective study, published in English, had a T4 + T3 combination therapy test group and a T4 monotherapy control group, patients aged ≥18 years and with overt primary hypothyroidism, and published after January 2000) were applied by two reviewers; any disagreement was resolved by a third reviewer. The two reviewers independently extracted data using a standard data form and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Coprimary outcomes included the psychological health measures of depression, fatigue, pain, anxiety and anger, measured using validated and reliable instruments.
Results
Eighteen of 2029 studies (883 patients) were included in the meta‐analysis. No significant difference was found between T4 + T3 combination therapy and T4 monotherapy with regard to depression (standardized mean difference [SMD]: −0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.18; 0.07), fatigue (SMD: 0.06, 95% CI: −0.13; 0.26), pain (SMD: −0.01, 95% CI: −0.24; 0.22), anxiety (SMD: 0.01, 95% CI: −0.15; 0.17) and anger (SMD: 0.05, 95% CI: −0.15; 0.24). Methodological heterogeneity had no influence on the results. The patients preferred combination therapy significantly.
Conclusions
Compared with T4 monotherapy, T4 + T3 combination therapy had no significant advantage in improving psychological health. For patients who are unsatisfied with LT4 monotherapy, the patient and the physician should make a joint decision concerning therapy.
“…Although patients preferred the combination in some studies, this was not explained necessarily by improvements in symptoms related to hypothyroidism, as described above. Recent (2018 50 and 2021 51 ) systematic review/meta-analyses concluded that the addition of T3 to LT4 therapy had little benefit in terms of objective improvements in such outcomes (the more recent review also concluded that LT4 + T3 and LT4 monotherapy were tolerated similarly). However, these trials were conducted in relatively broad populations of patients with hypothyroidism, did not consistently use disease-specific instruments for measuring patientreported outcomes, and therefore cannot exclude a potential benefit in subgroups of patients with hypothyroidism: these issues are discussed in greater detail below.…”
Declaration of fundingMerck Healthcare KGaA funded medical writing services (see below) and Fast Track review for this article. No other funding applied.
Declaration of financial/other relationshipsUH is an employee of Merck Healthcare KGaA. GJK has acted as a consultant for Merck Healthcare KGaA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.