Serious games (SGs) have emerged to improve the commitment and performance of user players, since they perform an exact mission, integrating with the game mechanics, thus creating a very attractive mission. In software engineering (SE), SGs have been addressed to increase the commitment of developers. Moreover, the use of SGs is of great interest to train and train future professionals to experience situations that they could face in software development. This study presents a multivocal literature review (MLR) to systematize and categorize the state-of-the-art of SGs for teaching Agile Methods. The MLR allowed software practitioners and teachers to identify cutting-edge methods for evaluating SGs, application domains in which the assessments were carried out, and the main features considered for assessing the educational benefits of SGs. For academics and professionals eager to test SGs in the training field of Agile Methods, the findings are helpful to (i) provide evidence regarding the usage of games in SE education, (ii) design game-based teaching/learning strategies, and (iii) offer a repertoire of tactics for assessing the use of SGs in SE courses. In conclusion, the knowledge collected was structured and classified to provide a response to our research questions, aimed at providing a summary of the key research in this area, as well as defining open issues in the field.
La presente investigación tuvo como objetivo evaluar las propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario Dirty Dozen de Jonason y Webster de personalidad oscura en una muestra de adultos varones argentinos recluidos en penitenciarias. Se constituyó una muestra de 693 adultos masculinos que se encontraban cumpliendo condenas en tres unidades penitenciarias de la Argentina. El mejor ajuste del cuestionario es el derivado de un Modelo Exploratorio de Ecuaciones Estructurales: CFI=.991, TLI=.984, RMSEA=.043 y SRMR=.021. También se observa invarianza de este modelo según la edad. La consistencia interna medida a partir del alfa de Cronbach es satisfactoria, con .84 para maquiavelismo, .68 para psicopatía y .82 para narcisismo. Se halla validez concurrente y de criterio de los puntajes del cuestionario con la edad, el tiempo de reclusión, haber estado antes condenado, el tipo de delito y la perpetración del bullying.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.