Plants of the genus Allium developed a diversity of defense mechanisms against pathogenic fungi of the genus Fusarium, including transcriptional activation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes. However, the information on the regulation of PR factors in garlic (Allium sativum L.) is limited. In the present study, we identified AsPR genes putatively encoding PR1, PR2, PR4, and PR5 proteins in A. sativum cv. Ershuizao, which may be involved in the defense against Fusarium infection. The promoters of the AsPR1–5 genes contained jasmonic acid-, salicylic acid-, gibberellin-, abscisic acid-, auxin-, ethylene-, and stress-responsive elements associated with the response to plant parasites. The expression of AsPR1c, d, g, k, AsPR2b, AsPR5a, c (in roots), and AsPR4a(c), b, and AsPR2c (in stems and cloves) significantly differed between garlic cultivars resistant and susceptible to Fusarium rot, suggesting that it could define the PR protein-mediated protection against Fusarium infection in garlic. Our results provide insights into the role of PR factors in A. sativum and may be useful for breeding programs to increase the resistance of Allium crops to Fusarium infections.
Vegetables of the Allium genus are prone to infection by Fusarium fungi. Chitinases of the GH19 family are pathogenesis-related proteins inhibiting fungal growth through the hydrolysis of cell wall chitin; however, the information on garlic (Allium sativum L.) chitinases is limited. In the present study, we identified seven class I chitinase genes, AsCHI1–7, in the A. sativum cv. Ershuizao genome, which may have a conserved function in the garlic defense against Fusarium attack. The AsCHI1–7 promoters contained jasmonic acid-, salicylic acid-, gibberellins-, abscisic acid-, auxin-, ethylene-, and stress-responsive elements associated with defense against pathogens. The expression of AsCHI2, AsCHI3, and AsCHI7 genes was constitutive in Fusarium-resistant and -susceptible garlic cultivars and was mostly induced at the early stage of F. proliferatum infection. In roots, AsCHI2 and AsCHI3 mRNA levels were increased in the susceptible and decreased in the resistant cultivar, whereas in cloves, AsCHI7 and AsCHI5 expression was decreased in the susceptible but increased in the resistant plants, suggesting that these genes are involved in the garlic response to Fusarium proliferatum attack. Our results provide insights into the role of chitinases in garlic and may be useful for breeding programs to increase the resistance of Allium crops to Fusarium infections.
Plant antifungal proteins include the pathogenesis-related (PR)-5 family of fungi- and other stress-responsive thaumatin-like proteins (TLPs). However, the information on the TLPs of garlic (Allium sativum L.), which is often infected with soil Fusarium fungi, is very limited. In the present study, we identified 32 TLP homologs in the A. sativum cv. Ershuizao genome, which may function in the defense against Fusarium attack. The promoters of A. sativumTLP (AsTLP) genes contained cis-acting elements associated with hormone signaling and response to various types of stress, including those caused by fungal pathogens and their elicitors. The expression of AsTLP genes in Fusarium-resistant and -susceptible garlic cultivars was differently regulated by F. proliferatum infection. Thus, in the roots the mRNA levels of AsTLP7–9 and 21 genes were increased in resistant and decreased in susceptible A. sativum cultivars, suggesting the involvement of these genes in the garlic response to F. proliferatum attack. Our results provide insights into the role of TLPs in garlic and may be useful for breeding programs to increase the resistance of Allium crops to Fusarium infections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.