A conference is a team meeting which is undertaken by nursing staff at every shift change. The conference is conducted before (pre-conference) or after (post-conference) handover. The implementation of this conference has an impact on student skills in reporting plans and results of nursing care during shift changes. This study seeks to acquire an overview of the implementation of pre-conference and post-conference practices by nursing students in clinical practice. This research is a literature review study with five articles. Article ratings are measured using the JBI (The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools) format. The literature review was conducted using one database (Google Scholar) for previous studies published in the last 10 years (2010–2020). Of the five articles included in this study, one concluded the discussion pre-conference badly, two concluded the pre-conference was not optimal, and two articles concluded the pre-conference processes were acceptable. For the results obtained in post-conference research, one article did not explain explicitly about the implementation of the post-conference procedures, one concluded that the implementation of the post-conference was not optimal, one concluded that the implementation of the post-conference was quite optimal, and two articles concluded that the post-conference procedures were quite good. It is hoped that the results of this literature review can provide education and information for students, science, educational institutions related to the implementation of the method conference. Nursing students are advised to hold conferences accordingly with standard operating procedures (SOP) for good implementation results Keywords: Nursing Student, conference, clinical practice
Mathematical representation is the ability of students to explore and use mathematical ideas explicitly. This study aimed to learn about the effectiveness of the Mastery Learning Assessment Model (MLAM) in mathematics learning at the Assyfa Learning Center Foundation Pasuruan, which then described students' abilities in solving mathematical representation problems evaluated from mathematical dispositions. MLAM is based on repeating a similar assessment through an overhaul of mastery learning from previous researchers. This study used a descriptive qualitative method. In the study presented here, 20 subjects were pooled and surveyed using a continuous assessment tool based on high, low, and moderate math ability. The results showed that almost all students could use representational images to solve mathematical problems, create mathematical models, and solve problems related to mathematical expressions. On the other hand, most students could not complete the two indicators of mathematical representation, namely making sketches and mathematical models based on the given situation and data. This result is indicated by the 75% of students who completed this lesson. Based on the Teaching Evaluation (TER) results, most students are also satisfied with this approach. It is expected that the MLAM assessment can improve students' mathematical representation skills.
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membuat instrumen diagnostik two-tier yang dapat mendeteksi miskonsepsi siswa tentang materi segitiga dan segiempat. Metode deskriptif digunakan untuk membuat instrumen dari bahan segitiga, sedangkan metode RD digunakan untuk membuat instrumen dari bahan segi empat. Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen diagnostik two-tier dievaluasi. Uji validitas instrumen menunjukkan bahwa 8 soal dari 10 soal materi segitiga dan 7 soal dari 10 soal materi segi empat dinyatakan valid. Instrumen tersebut kemudian diujicobakan pada siswa SMP kelas tujuh dan delapan. Hasil tes dianalisis dan ditafsirkan untuk mengidentifikasi kesalahpahaman. Berdasarkan temuan penelitian ini, miskonsepsi siswa tentang materi segitiga antara lain mengidentifikasi jenis-jenis segitiga berdasarkan panjang sisi dan besar sudut, serta menentukan tinggi segitiga yang menyebabkan mereka salah menghitung luas segitiga. Kesalahpahaman tentang materi segi empat di kalangan siswa termasuk indikator teoritis untuk mendefinisikan segiempat dan jajaran genjang.
The aim of this study was to describe the differences of students' problem-solving abilities in completing mathematics problem in the form of story-based problems in terms of gender difference. The type of research used is qualitative and quantitative descriptive research using research instruments, namely tests of problem-solving abilities and interview. Selection of subjects using a random cluster random technique, based on teacher considerations. The subjects in this study were 26 students of class IX of SMPN 8 Mataram in the academic year of 2020/2021. The data collection method started from making observations at school, then distributing the problem-solving ability test which contains 2 problems in the form of elaborative questions. AT the last stage, the researcher conducted interviews with 6 people who were obtained from each representative of the criteria for the test results of the problem-solving abilities that had been given. The data analysis technique in this study was conducted by looking at the test scores of mathematics problem-solving abilities seen from the criteria of high, moderate, and low. The results obtained were: (1) the ability of female students in grade IX at SMPN 8 Mataram to solve mathematics problems related to the statistical topic in form of story-based problems was in moderate criteria with the average score obtained was 73.44, (2) the ability of male students in grade IX at SMPN 8 Mataram to solve mathematics problems related to the statistical topic in form of story-based problems was in moderate criteria with the average score obtained was 77,64, and (3) the difference in problem-solving abilities of male and female students lies on the steps used in solving mathematics problems based on Polya problem solving stages.
Geometry is a branch of mathematics that deals with shapes and dimensions. In learning geometry it is not uncommon for students to experience difficulties and mistakes in understanding concepts. Motivation is an important factor that needs to be considered so that students remain enthusiastic in the learning process of geometry. Motivation becomes a driving force and trigger for students to be active in the learning process. This research aims to provide a portrait of the motivational condition of junior high school students in learning geometry. This research is quantitative descriptive. The research was conducted on 136 junior high school students who were randomly selected from 3 different cities, namely Medan, Tulungagung and Lombok. The data collection technique was carried out using a motivational questionnaire instrument. Data analysis was performed with descriptive statistical analysis. The results of this research indicate that junior high school students' motivation in learning geometry is high with a score of 3.96 on a scale of 1-5.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.