Ca(v)1.4 plays a key role in photoreceptor synaptogenesis and synaptic function in mouse retina. Cacna1f ( G305X ) is a true knockout model for human CSNB2, with prominent defects in cone and rod function. Cacna1f ( nob2 ) is an incomplete knockout model for CSNB2, because alternative splicing in an ETn element leads to some full-length Ca(v)1.4 protein, and some cones surviving to drive photopic visual responses.

IMPORTANCE Detection of Clostridioides difficile has frequently been described in asymptomatic infants and children, but accurate estimates across the age spectrum are unavailable. OBJECTIVE To assess the prevalence of C difficile detection among asymptomatic children across the age spectrum. DATA SOURCES This systematic review and meta-analysis included a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2020. Search terms included Clostridium difficile, Peptoclostridium difficile, Clostridioides difficile, CDF OR CDI OR c diff OR c difficile, Clostridium infections OR cd positive diarrhea OR cd positive diarrhea OR Clostridium difficile OR Peptoclostridium difficile OR pseudomembranous colitis OR pseudomembranous enterocolitis, enterocolitis, and pseudomembranous. These were combined with the following terms: bacterial colonization and colonization OR colonized OR colonizing OR epidemiology OR prevalence OR seroprevalence. STUDY SELECTION Studies were screened independently by 2 authors. Studies were included if they reported testing for C difficile among asymptomatic children (ie, children without diarrhea) younger than 18 years.DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by 2 reviewers. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was prevalence of C difficile detection among asymptomatic children. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of toxigenic vs nontoxigenic strains of C difficile and prevalence of C difficile detection stratified by geographic region, income status, testing method, and year of testing. RESULTS A total of 95 studies with 19 186 participants were included. Rates of detection of toxigenic or nontoxigenic C difficile were greatest among infants aged 6 to 12 months (41%; 95% CI, 32%-50%) and decreased to 12% (95% CI, 7%-18%) among children aged 5 to 18 years. The prevalence of toxigenic C difficile colonization was lower, peaking at 14% (95% CI, 8%-21%) among infants aged 6 to 12 months and decreasing to 6% (95% CI, 2%-11%) among children older than 5 years. Although prevalence differed by geographic region (ie, North and South America vs Europe: β, −0.151, P = .001; North and South America vs Western Pacific: β, 0.136, P = .007), there was no difference by testing method (ie, culture vs polymerase chain reaction: β, 0.069, P = .052; culture vs enzyme immunoassay: β, −0.178, P = .051), income class (low-middle income vs high income: β, −0.144, P = .23; upper-middle vs high income: β, −0.020,

No abstract

No abstract

ObjectiveTo estimate the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infected children experiencing hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, severe outcomes, and death.Data SourcesPubMed, Embase, and MedRxiv were searched for studies published between December 1, 2019 and May 28, 2021. References of relevant systematic reviews were also screened.Study SelectionWe included cohort or cross-sectional studies reporting on at least one outcome measure (i.e., hospitalization, ICU admission, severe outcomes, death) for ≥100 children ≤21 years old within 28 days of SARS-CoV-2 positivity; no language restrictions were applied.Data Extraction and SynthesisTwo independent reviewers performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Estimates were pooled using random effects models. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPercentage of SARS-CoV-2 positive children experiencing hospitalization, ICU admission, severe outcome, and death.Results118 studies representing 3,324,851 SARS-CoV-2 infected children from 68 countries were included. Community-based studies (N = 48) reported that 3.3% (95%CI: 2.7–4.0%) of children were hospitalized, 0.3% (95%CI: 0.2–0.6%) were admitted to the ICU, 0.1% (95%CI: 0.0–2.2%) experienced a “severe” outcome and 0.02% (95%CI: 0.001–0.05%) died. Hospital-based screening studies (N = 39) reported that 23.9% (95%CI: 19.0–29.2%) of children were hospitalized, 2.9% (95%CI: 2.1–3.8%) were admitted to the ICU, 1.3% (95%CI: 0.5–2.3%) experienced a severe outcome, and 0.2% (95%CI: 0.02–0.5%) died. Studies of hospitalized children (N = 31) reported that 10.1% (95%CI: 6.1–14.9%) of children required ICU admission, 4.2% (95%CI: 0.0–13.8%) had a severe outcome and 1.1% (95%CI: 0.2–2.3%) died. Low risk of bias studies, those from high-income countries, and those reporting outcomes later in the pandemic presented lower estimates. However, studies reporting outcomes after May 31, 2020, compared to earlier publications, had higher proportions of hospitalized patients requiring ICU admission and experiencing severe outcomes.Conclusion and RelevanceAmong children tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 3.3% were hospitalized, with rates being higher early in the pandemic. Severe outcomes, ICU admission and death were uncommon, however estimates vary by study population, pandemic timing, study risk of bias, and economic status of the country.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, identifier [CRD42021260164].

Pubertal status rather than HbA(1c) appears to affect selectively the S-VEP latency of preteen children with T1D. Further study is warranted to determine whether the delay in S-VEP latency in pubertal children with T1D changes over time and whether this change could be a predictive marker for future development of background diabetic retinopathy.

No abstract

IMPORTANCEThe published evidence in support of probiotic use is conflicting, which may be a result of selective publication of probiotic trials.OBJECTIVES To compare the proportion of registered trials that evaluate pediatric probiotics vs those that evaluate antibiotics that are published and to identify study-related factors associated with publication status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study evaluated eligible trials