No abstract

Coral reefs are deteriorating worldwide prompting reef managers and stakeholders to increasingly explore new management tools. Following back-to-back bleaching in 2016/2017, multi-taxa coral nurseries were established in 2018 for the first time on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) to aid reef maintenance and restoration at a “high-value” location–Opal Reef–frequented by the tourism industry. Various coral species (n = 11) were propagated within shallow water (ca. 4-7m) platforms installed across two sites characterised by differing environmental exposure–one adjacent to a deep-water channel (Blue Lagoon) and one that was relatively sheltered (RayBan). Growth rates of coral fragments placed onto nurseries were highly variable across taxa but generally higher at Blue Lagoon (2.1–10.8 cm2 month-1 over 12 months) compared to RayBan (0.6–6.6 cm2 month-1 over 9 months). Growth at Blue Lagoon was largely independent of season, except for Acropora tenuis and Acropora hyacinthus, where growth rates were 15–20% higher for December 2018-July 2019 (“warm season”) compared to August-December 2018 (“cool season”). Survivorship across all 2,536 nursery fragments was ca. 80–100%, with some species exhibiting higher survivorship at Blue Lagoon (Acropora loripes, Porites cylindrica) and others at RayBan (A. hyacinthus, Montipora hispida). Parallel measurements of growth and survivorship were used to determine relative return-on-effort (RRE) scores as an integrated metric of “success” accounting for life history trade-offs, complementing the mutually exclusive assessment of growth or survivorship. RRE scores within sites (across species) were largely driven by growth, whereas RRE scores between sites were largely driven by survivorship. The initial nursery phase of coral propagation therefore appears useful to supplement coral material naturally available for stewardship of frequently visited Great Barrier Reef tourism (high-value) sites, but further assessment is needed to evaluate how well the growth rates and survival for nursery grown corals translate once material is outplanted.

Misinformation from another witness has been shown to impair eyewitness reports, but little is known about how it may influence eyewitness identification. In Experiment 1, adult pairs comprising one participant and one experimental confederate viewed a video clip of a staged theft. Half of the participants were then misinformed by the confederate that the thief's accomplice had blue eyes (in fact, they were brown). Next, individual participants described the accomplice and completed a target-absent photographic line-up task comprising blue-eyed members. Misinformed participants were several times more likely than controls to describe the accomplice as having blue eyes, and twice as likely to identify someone from the line-up. In Experiment 2, when line-up members' eye colour was digitally altered from blue to brown, the line-up effect disappeared, suggesting that the increase in identifications in Experiment 1 was not a generalised increase in willingness to choose from the line-up. In Experiment 3, we discounted the possibility that discussion alone could account for the line-up misinformation effect, by subjecting all participants to co-witness discussion.

It has become a common expectation for an animal’s guts to be a site for bacterial symbiosis, which may play a role in influencing various aspects of physiology including digestion and immune responses. The presence of a microbiome in the digestive tracts of crustaceans has been demonstrated in the past using molecular techniques and has encouraged manipulations including probiotics to enhance growth rates in cultured species. We suggest, however, that bacteria are restricted to the lumen of the gut and separated from the epithelium by the peritrophic matrix, which prevents their establishment as a permanent component of the gut. The peritrophic matrix, found in most arthropods, is a chitinous sheet containing accessory molecules, and is continuously formed by delamination from the epithelium of the midgut such that the actual surface is constantly being cleaned. The lifted layer then surrounds ingested materials, including microbes, in an impenetrable wrapper compartmentalizing digestive and immune functions. The ectoperitrophic space, lying between the peritrophic matrix and the epithelium, was examined in six species representatives of six groups of crustaceans (Branchiopoda, Amphipoda, Copepoda, and Decapoda) for the presence of microbes using light and transmission electron microscopy as well as fluorescent probes for bacteria. The results suggest that a microbiome is lacking in several common groups of crustaceans.

No abstract