1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf01071318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stability of the specific-mate recognition system ofDrosophila melanogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude that ascertaining sexual isolation in Drosophila through the commonly used design of the multiple-choice mating test depends not only on possible genetic differences directly involved in recognition between the examined lines, but also on minor and often uncontrolled variables, such as temperature of rearing, preadult density and inbreeding level. The corollary is that the number of true cases of sexual isolation in Drosophila could be less than found in the literature, which agrees with a great stability of the Drosophila melanogaster mating system (Lambert and Henderson 1986). This assertion is also supported by our review of published data showing a clear bias towards the occurrence of positive sexual isolation at the intraspecific level in both D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…We conclude that ascertaining sexual isolation in Drosophila through the commonly used design of the multiple-choice mating test depends not only on possible genetic differences directly involved in recognition between the examined lines, but also on minor and often uncontrolled variables, such as temperature of rearing, preadult density and inbreeding level. The corollary is that the number of true cases of sexual isolation in Drosophila could be less than found in the literature, which agrees with a great stability of the Drosophila melanogaster mating system (Lambert and Henderson 1986). This assertion is also supported by our review of published data showing a clear bias towards the occurrence of positive sexual isolation at the intraspecific level in both D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The present study shows undisputedly that this song trait plays an important role in species recognition also in D. montana, while our earlier studies have shown the pulse characters of the song (PL, FRE) to be important in intraspecific sexual selection in this species . The fact that the male song, or different traits of the song, plays a role both in species recognition and in sexual selection may restrict song evolution, as signals important in species-recognition should not vary too much to retain species-specificity (Lambert and Henderson, 1986). On the other hand, directional sexual selection may enhance the evolution of species-recognition signals and strengthen sexual isolation, if the female preferences vary between the species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, random genetic drift (Lande 1976) and adaptation to variable environmental conditions (Hoffmann and Merilä 1999) may give rise to population differentiation in mating signals, but their effects have been less studied than those of sexual selection. Stabilising selection, on the other hand, should lead to evolutionary stability of traits involved in the mate recognition system throughout the distribution of a species (Lambert and Henderson 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%