Online content viewable at: https://www.thieme-connect.com/

NCT01368289.

No abstract

This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity, also eligible for MOC credit, on page e16 (https://www. gastrojournal.org/cme/home). Learning Objective: Upon completion of this CME activity, successful learners will be able to (1) identify key aspects of colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), (2) recognize the limitations of piecemeal resection, (3) explain how ablation of the post-EMR mucosal defect can mitigate those limitations, and (4) evaluate the future implications of these findings.

In a prospective study of 2106 patients who underwent EMR for large sessile or flat colorectal polyps or laterally spreading lesions, we associated rectosigmoid location, combined Paris classification and surface morphology, and increasing size with increased risk for covert malignancy. Rectosigmoid 0-Is and 0-IIa+Is non-granular lesions have a high risk for malignancy, whereas proximally located 0-Is or 0-IIa granular lesions have a low risk. These findings can be used to inform decisions on which patients should undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection, EMR, or surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02000141.

NCT01368289; results.

No abstract

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01368289.