2019
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Ablation of Mucosal Defect Margins Reduces Adenoma Recurrence After Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Abstract: This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity, also eligible for MOC credit, on page e16 (https://www. gastrojournal.org/cme/home). Learning Objective: Upon completion of this CME activity, successful learners will be able to (1) identify key aspects of colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), (2) recognize the limitations of piecemeal resection, (3) explain how ablation of the post-EMR mucosal defect can mitigate those limitations, and (4) evaluate the future implications of these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
175
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
175
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrated that the local colon adenoma recurrence rate in our cohort of patients with ≥ 20-mm colon LSTs managed using cap-fitted colonoscopy with EMR and ablation of the resection edge with APC was low (4.5 %). This adenoma recurrence rate was much lower than 16.0 % to 32 % reported in the literature on traditional EMR for non-pedunculated polyps (▶ Table 3) [3,10,12,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study demonstrated that the local colon adenoma recurrence rate in our cohort of patients with ≥ 20-mm colon LSTs managed using cap-fitted colonoscopy with EMR and ablation of the resection edge with APC was low (4.5 %). This adenoma recurrence rate was much lower than 16.0 % to 32 % reported in the literature on traditional EMR for non-pedunculated polyps (▶ Table 3) [3,10,12,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We postulate that routine APC ablation of EMR defects using cap fitted colonoscope removes microscopic residual adenoma at the resection edge that is not identified by the endoscopist as shown previously, [20] which accounts for the low recurrence rate in our study (4.5 %). A recent RCT demonstrated significant reduction in adenoma recurrence in patients who underwent ablation of post-EMR defects using snare tip soft coagulation [21]. This method of snare tip coagulation is an attractive option given its simplicity and ▶ Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colon cancer is the third‐most frequent cancer worldwide . Although great treatment advancements have been achieved, the high frequency of recurrence in patients with colon cancer remains the major problem in clinical practice .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, recent investigation has produced impressive improvements in decreasing polyp recurrence rates after EMR. 19 With the role of prophylactic clipping clarified, we can achieve lower complication rates after EMR of large right colon lesions, which should reduce fear of performing large right colon EMRs. Further, we can improve the cost effectiveness of clipping by refraining from clip use after resection of low risk lesions where no benefit has been demonstrated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%