Evidence for an association between cannabis and psychosis has been documented in literature in many forms including experimental studies, epidemiological data, and case series. The association has implications for psychotic outcomes ranging from mild to severe and occurring over minutes to years. Due to the huge variety of exposures and outcome measures reported, creating a coherent account of all the available information is difficult. A useful way to conceptualize these wide-ranging results is to consider the association between cannabis and psychosis as it occurs within the context of widely used DSM-5 diagnoses. In the present review we examine cannabis/psychosis associations as they pertain to Cannabis Intoxication, Cannabis-Induced Psychotic Disorder, and Schizophrenia. This allows for an understanding of the cannabis and psychosis association along something approaching a continuum. Cannabis intoxication becomes Cannabis-Induced Psychotic Disorder once certain severity and duration criteria are met and Cannabis-Induced Psychotic Disorder is heavily associated with future schizophrenia diagnoses.

No abstract

Background Deaths attributable to fentanyl (FEN, a synthetic opioid) are high in Appalachia and highest in West Virginia. The goal of the study was to determine FEN prevalence among specimens submitted for definitive opioid testing and monitor responses to provider notifications of unexpected FEN findings during Q1 2020. Methods All definitive opioid test data were reviewed daily for FEN signatures in Q1 2020. Unexpected FEN results were communicated to providers and monitored for 10 days to record actions taken. Prevalence data were categorized. Behavioral Medicine (BMED) leaders analyzed January data and implemented FEN screening in the clinic. BMED Q1 clinic visits and order volumes for drug screens were reviewed after Q1. Results FEN positivity was 11% in Q1; >60% of findings were unexpected. Actions were taken for 54% of notifications in January but only 18% in March. Notifications required 70 hours of combined laboratory effort each month. BMED providers ordered 44% of definitive opioid tests and 69% of definitive FEN tests. Data prompted the addition of FEN to routine drug screen panels in the laboratory, and a 10% random FEN screening rate in the BMED opioid use disorder clinics (COAT). Conclusions Prevalence of FEN positivity was higher than initially expected, even for this region in Appalachia. Expanded presence of FEN screening should assist BMED providers with clinical efforts and help identify patients in need of intervention/therapy.