Background Totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) is a completely closed intravenous infusion system that stays in the human body for a long time. It is used for the infusion of strong irritating or hyperosmotic drugs, nutritional support treatment, blood transfusion and blood specimen collection, and other purposes. There are two common ways of TIVAP: internal jugular vein implantation and subclavian vein implantation. However, the postoperative complications of the two implantation methods are quite different, and there is no recommended implantation method in the relevant guidelines. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the difference in complications of the two implantation methods, and choose the better implantation method. Methods Computer search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library database was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the establishment of the database to October 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 1086 patients in five studies were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of infection (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.43–1.48, p = .47), catheter blockage (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.15–3.46, p = .68), port squeeze (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.14–8.02, p = .95), catheter-related thrombosis (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.22–3.38, p = 0.83), catheter displacement (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.22–1.12, p = .09), extravasation (RR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01–2.15, p = .15), and catheter rupture (RR = 3.77, 95% CI: 0.16–89.76, p = .41) between the two implantation paths. Conclusions There is little difference in the complication rate of TIVAP between internal jugular vein insertion and subclavian vein insertion. Due to the small number of included studies, there are certain limitations, and more studies need to be included for analysis in the future.
Objective. To explore the effect of the case management mode combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in elderly patients with hip fracture. Methods. A total of 102 elderly hip fracture patients admitted to our hospital from June 2018 to December 2019 were selected. The patients with hip fracture were divided into the control group (n = 51) and the observation group (n = 51) by the random number table method. The control group adopts the conventional nursing mode, and the observation group adopts the case management mode combined with ERAS. The bed activity time, hospitalization time, total hospitalization expenses, and the satisfaction of patients were observed. The numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to assess the patient’s pain before treatment and at 1, 3, and 5 days after treatment. The Harris score was used to assess the patient’s joint motor function before treatment and at the 8th week after treatment. The perioperative complications of the two groups were compared. Result. After treatment, the observation group was better than the control group in terms of out of bed activity time, hospitalization time, total hospitalization expenses, and the satisfaction of patients ( P < 0.05 ). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in NRS scores between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). After treatment, the NRS scores of the two groups were lower than before treatment, and on days 1, 3, and 5 after treatment, the NRS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group ( P < 0.05 ). Before treatment, there was no difference in the Harris score between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). At the 8th week after treatment, the Harris scores of the two groups were higher than those before treatment, and the Harris scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group ( P < 0.05 ). The total incidence of perioperative complications in the observation group (4/51) was lower than that in the control group (13/51) ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. The application of the case management mode combined with ERAS nursing in elderly patients with hip fracture can improve the clinical symptoms of patients, improve the therapeutic effect, and reduce the occurrence of complications, which is worthy of clinical application.
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) are widely used in cardiology because they are convenient, effective, and safe. However, PICC implantation in patients with mirror-image dextrocardia who have thoracic tumors has not yet been reported. In this case report, we describe a 46-year-old patient with lung cancer who had a thoracic inclination and left pulmonary artery compression of the superior vena cava. PICC implantation under B-ultrasound guidance was planned. Because of the anatomical differences caused by mirror-image dextrocardia, we investigated the optimal position and measurement method for the tip of the PICC according to the compression site of the vascular lumen through a multidisciplinary team approach. Electrocardiography-assisted tip positioning combined with postoperative chest X-ray positioning was performed for accurate positioning.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.