Fifteen subjects presenting with intractable constipation due to obstructive defecation, mean (SEM) duration 8.8 (1.8) years, had the inappropriate contraction and electromyographic changes in the pelvic floor muscles and external anal sphincter typical of this condition. An electromyographicaily derived index was used to grade its severity. A self applied biofeedback device was used to aliow electromyographic recording of the abnormal external anal sphincter. The subjects were encouraged to reduce the abnormal electromyographic activity on straining after instruction and training. The procedure was intended as a relearning process in which the nonrelaxing activity of the pelvic floor was gradually suppressed. Biofeedback training was maintained on a domiciliary basis for a mean time of 3-1 weeks and resulted in a significant reduction in the anismus index (mean (SEM) 69.9 (7.8)% before biofeedback, mean 14 (3.9)% after biofeedback, p

No abstract

The motility responses of the sigmoid colon, rectum and external anal sphincter to sequential electrical stimulation of the anterior sacral roots (S2, S3 and S4) were studied in five patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Identical and reproducible results were obtained. S2 stimulation provoked isolated low-pressure colorectal contractions. S3 stimulation initiated high-pressure colorectal motor activity which appeared peristaltic and was enhanced with repetitive stimuli. This response appeared to be frequency-dependent. S4 stimulation increased colonic and rectal tone. External sphincter activity was stimulated in increasing order from S2 to S4. These observations directly elucidate the central control of colorectal motility and may have implications in the treatment of severe constipation following spinal injury.

SummaryTen subjects with severe constipation due to complete spinal cord injury (SCI) had pro longed oro-anal transit time (p

Colorectal and anal sphincter motility and electrophysiology were investigated in 14 women with profound constipation following hysterectomy and compared with an asymptomatic group of control subjects. Twelve patients complained of significant urinary symptoms. No differences in the motor function of the anal sphincters were detectable. The latency of the pudendoanal reflex was unchanged after hysterectomy. Proctometrograms demonstrated significantly increased rectal volumes and compliance in the hysterectomy group together with deficits of rectal sensory function. In the basal state a significant proximal-to-distal sigmoid colon motility gradient existed only in the control group. Following stimulation with Prostigmin, this gradient was enhanced in the control group but paradoxically reversed in the hysterectomized patients, thus constituting a functional obstruction. Denervation supersensitivity was demonstrable in two patients tested with carbachol provocation but not in control subjects. These findings suggest dysfunction in the autonomic innervation of the hindgut in some patients who had undergone hysterectomy, resulting in severe constipation.