1991
DOI: 10.1038/sc.1991.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constipation associated with chronic spinal cord injury: the effect of pelvic parasympathetic stimulation by the Brindley stimulator

Abstract: SummaryTen subjects with severe constipation due to complete spinal cord injury (SCI) had pro longed oro-anal transit time (p Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(1 reference statement)
2
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] There is Level 2 evidence (from one prospective, non-randomizedcontrolled trial) 51 that supports the use of sacral anterior root stimulation to reduce severe constipation in complete injuries. Binnie et al 51 had found that an implanted Brindley stimulator did not reduce oro-cecal time for individuals with Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the enema continence catheter. A catheter is inserted into the rectum and a balloon is inflated to hold the catheter in place during the administration of an enema.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] There is Level 2 evidence (from one prospective, non-randomizedcontrolled trial) 51 that supports the use of sacral anterior root stimulation to reduce severe constipation in complete injuries. Binnie et al 51 had found that an implanted Brindley stimulator did not reduce oro-cecal time for individuals with Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the enema continence catheter. A catheter is inserted into the rectum and a balloon is inflated to hold the catheter in place during the administration of an enema.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bladder control can be successfully achieved by using Brindley's anterior root stimulator implant. Because most of these patients had concomitant bowel dysfunction, its effect on bowel function as defecation has been documented by Varma et al [12] , in 1986, MacDonagh et al [13] , in 1990, Binnie et al [14] , in 1991, Chia et al [15] , in 1996 and Creasey et al [11] , in 2001. The mechanism of improvement in bowel function is attributed to the activation of contraction of the terminal colon and rectum, resulting in the movement of feces caudally into the anal canal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors [12][13][14][15] have reported the clinical and manometric results of the implanted neuroprosthesis. However, experimental studies concerning electrically stimulated defecation are fen [15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anecdotally, the subject related that his satisfaction with using stimulation correlated not with the decreased time required to defecate, but with the greater quantity of fecal material he felt he passed. With the Finetech-Brindley implanted stimulator, it has been reported that sacral nerve stimulation provided both an improvement in the frequency of defecation 19 and a decreased time for bowel evacuation. 20 In our study, the high-lowfrequency stimulation paradigm appeared to provide added benefit over a low-frequency only pattern in that the average defecation time was further reduced by 20%.…”
Section: Stimulation For Bladder and Bowel Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%