This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Territorial settlement systems are being increasingly affected by external multidirectional factors. As a result, decision makers face a dilemma to maintain their existing organization or to carry out functional and spatial reorganization. Conventional approaches to territorial development do not fully take into account the relationship between the concepts of spatial development and the formation of management principles, thus being unable to determine the prospective indicators of their dynamics. Improving methodologies in the sphere of urban planning is associated with identifying objective pre-requisites for a complete transition to digital processes and strengthening the principles of their system support. The applied research methods included theoretical and system analysis, modelling and ex-perimental design. The authors published some results of the experiment in the open press. It is shown that territorial settlement systems are a special object of urban development. Various schemes of the interaction of management functions were analysed by comparing their advantages and disadvantages and by assessing their applicability to territorial systems. The feasibility of applying the methodology of system regionalism, increasing the role and importance of system regulation was argued. A methodo-logical approach establishing the interrelations of tasks and functions of management with basic models of the reorganization of territorial systems was proposed. This approach forms a basis for developing a mechanism for managing changes in territorial systems, allowing the dynamics and intensity of changes to be determined. Systematization of the parameters of territorial systems is used to determine the indi-cators of their planned changes. This significantly increases the manageability of territorial systems, allows a gradual assessment of the feasibility of urban projects and facilitates control over the devel-opment of urban planning documentation at all stages.
From the beginning of the XXI century between the processes of regional systems globalization and location development resources bigger contradictions can be seen. Balanced spatial development of territories is in ideal concepts and models for economics and society formation. But their implementation is under the influence of risks and threads. The uncial properties of regional systems are underestimated and their resource potential is used not reasonably. Thereby the strategic drift of globalization itself becomes not the fillip, but thread of perspective regional systems development. This investigation is dedicated to grounding ways to overcome its negative influence. Within this investigation we formulate a problem of global order tendencies analyses; development of new management tasks, including the formats of institutional norms, transforming the process of reproduction; forming of adaptive space reorganization procedure considering the lack of localized resources factor. Scientific novelty of the investigation is on optimization of the actual methods and tools for strategic management the territories and grounding the perspectives regional systems polistructural modelling. This allows to reduce strategic drift of globalization risks, modify regional economics evolution driving force and decrease human resources investigation process turbulence, assets, plots of land, preserve the integrality of the formed space and minimize its disbalance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.