Infrastructural Priorities And Regularities Of Spatial Development Of Regional Systems

Abstract

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Project Management For Sustainable Development Of Regions

“…It serves as an incentive for the process of updating the institutional environment, reflecting the most insignificant changes in the national policy in relation to specific territories (Leksin & Shvetsov, 2003). The project management method ensures the modernization and intensification of the interaction of economic objects and entities functioning with varying degrees of stability, initiates the process of improving the mechanisms built into it (Yushkova, Gushchina, Gaponenko, Dontsov, & Gushchin, 2019). This management technology is becoming increasingly common in the theory and practice of managing the territories of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in recent years.…”

“…This can lead to synchronization of the declared strategic development priorities and potential capabilities of the territories. As a general result, as applied to the current structural and hierarchical system of developing, coordinating and approving documents corresponding to various stages of management (goal setting, planning, forecasting, programming), a scenario is developed to overcome the methodological "delimitation" of the performed procedures (Yushkova, Gushchina, Gaponenko, Dontsov, & Gushchin, 2019). This should optimize the strategic planning process by forming effective links between different public administration institutions, the role of which is reinforced and emphasized by newly adopted from those indicators that were formed at the goal-setting stage (Tretyakova & Osipova, 2018…”

Spatial Development Dichotomy: Assessment Of The Potential And Implementation Of Territorial Systems

“…In the process of its implementation the following provisions were established: § the phenomenological nature of the integrity of territorial systems' spatial development Such elements are usually regarded as support subsystems (Yushkova et al, 2019): § transport support (highways, railways, waterways, transport hubs and facilities (airports, bridges); § engineering and technical support (water supply and sanitation, energy supply, waste disposal); § social support (a complex of structures, enterprises and institutions of non-productive sphere, functioning to meet the material and spiritual needs of the population, including housing, public services, education, science). Consequently, the emergence, renewal, speciation of such elements provokes and stimulates the reorganization of the territorial system as a whole.…”

“…//doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.05.97 Corresponding Author: O. А. Fikhtner Selection and peer-review under Given the fact that the model of polarized development is getting more and more distinct spatial fixation as the processes of social division of labor and constant redistribution of economic roles of regional market participants deepen, the loss of dominant importance by many of them is inevitable. Accordingly, the dominance of these processes leads to a pronounced spatial localization of territorial systems (Yushkova et al, 2019;. As a consequence, there is a mutual integration of structural and infrastructural components of territorial systems, the formations of the "collaboration" type.…”

“…At the same time, forecasting such processes, if they do not imply the possibility of significant transformations of the socio-economic space, cannot be considered as the leading methodology of scientific and technological progress. This explains the total spread of ideas describing the emergence of innovative forms of spatial formations that can radically change the existing relative order of territorial systems' functioning (Nefedova & Treivish, 2003;Kunth & Thorez, 2005;Lenz, Meyer, Miggelbrink, & Waack, 2007;Shuper, 2011;Druzhinin et al, 2017;Silva, 2018;Yushkova, Gushchina, Gaponenko, Dontsov, & Gushchin, 2019). The unconditional acceptance by territorial systems of all the diversity of spatial innovations and the reliance solely on the existing potential of the regions seem to be too idealistic.…”