SummaryThe pressor response associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation may be harmful to certain patients.

Neurogenic pulmonary oedema is a recognized complication of central nervous system injury. A case is presented where this condition was precipitated by induction of anaesthesia in a child with spina bifida, hydrocephalus and a malfunctioning ventriculo-peritoneal shunt.

Paired train-of-four (TOF) and double burst stimuli (DBS) were administered to the ulnar nerve at the wrist in 25 patients (group 1) paralysed with atracurium 0.5 mg kg-1; responses were measured mechanically (except every third DBS response which was manually evaluated). Another 30 patients (group 2) received a DBS every 60 s. A post-tetanic count (PTC) was performed when the first response (D1) was palpated. There was a significant correlation between the twitch heights of the first TOF response (T1) and D1 and likewise between the twitch heights of both second responses (r = 0.9; P less than 0.001), but there was a significant difference in regression coefficients of these two correlations (P less than 0.001). D1 was palpable first with a median PTC of 7. Our results showed that palpation of a single response implied a satisfactory level of paralysis. DBS may be useful for intraoperative clinical monitoring of neuromuscular block.

The multiple occlusion technique was used to study the effects of paralysis on ventilatory mechanics during anaesthesia. Total respiratory compliance (Crs) was measured during spontaneous breathing and following neuromuscular block with controlled ventilation in 23 infants. There was marked variation in response to paralysis: some infants demonstrated no change in Crs between the two states; others had values of Crs which were significantly higher during paralysis with controlled ventilation than during spontaneous breathing. A possible cause of these differences may be the type of controlled ventilation given during paralysis, with tidal volume directly influencing values of Crs obtained. The results of this study suggest that values of Crs obtained during spontaneous breathing and paralysis should not be used interchangeably until further studies have been performed to assess factors influencing Crs during controlled ventilation.

No abstract