Objective Two critical processes in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic involve assessing patients’ intensive care needs and predicting disease progression during patients’ intensive care unit (ICU) stay. We aimed to evaluate oxidative stress marker status at ICU admission and ICU discharge status in patients with COVID-19. Methods We included patients in a tertiary referral center ICU during June–December 2020. Scores of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and clinical severity, radiologic scores, and healthy discharge status were noted. We collected peripheral blood samples at ICU admission to evaluate total antioxidants, total oxidants, catalase, and myeloperoxidase levels. Results Thirty-one (24 male, 7 female) patients were included. At ICU admission, patients’ mean APACHE II score at ICU admission was 17.61 ± 8.9; the mean SOFA score was 6.29 ± 3.16. There was no significant relationship between clinical severity and oxidative stress (OS) markers nor between radiological imaging and COVID-19 data classification and OS levels. Differences in OS levels between patients with healthy and exitus discharge status were not significant. Conclusions We found no significant relationship between oxidative stress marker status in patients with COVID-19 at ICU admission and patients’ ICU discharge status.
SummaryObjectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of combined epidural analgesia with total intravenous anaesthesia and only total intravenous anaesthesia on the different clinical parameters. Methods: Sixty high risk patients undergoing a major abdominal surgical procedure were included in this prospective, double blind, randomized study. Induction of anaesthesia was performed with IV remifentanil 0.5µg/kg and propofol titrated to achieve bispectral index score between 40 and 50. after intubation; in Group E, 0.1% bupivacaine and 2 µg/mL fentanyl were administered by an infusion rate at 0.15 ml/kg/h via the epidural catheter and Group C received epidural normal saline as same infusion rate.
Results:In group E, intraoperative MAP values were significantly lower than those in group C (p<0.05). Time of extubation, time of eye opening with audible warning and time of verbal response was significantly lower in group E than those in group C. Total anaesthetic drug consumption was significantly higher in group C than those in group E (p<0.05). Conclusion: Based on lower requirements for propofol and remifentanil as well as the favourable effects on clinical parameters; we conclude that bispectral index score guided combined epidural with total intravenous anaesthesia is superior to solely total intravenous anaesthesia in this type of surgery.
Objectives To compare traditional surgery with two minimally invasive endo-venous procedures in terms of their long-term effect on the quality of life in great saphenous vein insufficiency (GSV). Method This prospective observational study included 217 patients that underwent surgical stripping (n = 62), radiofrequency ablation (n = 70), or cyanoacrylate embolization (n = 85) for the treatment of GSV insufficiency. Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) assessments were made, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire and Chronic Venous Insufficiency quality of life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) were administered, before and 1 year after the treatments. Results Surgical stripping group had significantly higher closure rates than the other groups (p < 0.05). At 12 months, decrease in VCSS scores was less pronounced in the cyanoacrylate embolization group when compared to the other two groups (p < 0.05). Improvement in CIVIQ-14 scores was better in the radiofrequency ablation group when compared to the cyanoacrylate embolization group (p < 0.05). Surgical stripping or radiofrequency ablation groups performed better on several domains of SF-36, when compared to the cyanoacrylate embolization group. Conclusions Surgical stripping and radiofrequency ablation seem to provide a better quality of life results at one year in patients undergoing treatment for GSV insufficiency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.