Artikel ini mengeksplorasi Penetapan Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung Nomor: 287/Pdt.P/2017/PA.TA, tentang pencabutan surat penolakan perkawinan dalam masa ‘iddah. Perkawinan dalam masa ‘iddah secara hukum positif tidak dapat dilaksanakan sebelum masa ‘iddah-nya habis, akan tetapi majelis hakim berpendapat lain yang berseberangan dengan KUA Kedungwaru Kabupaten Tulungagung, pihak KUA menyatakan bahwa calon mempelai wanita masih dalam masa ‘iddah hamil. Berdasarkan analisis,dalam putusannya majelis hakim menggunakan dasar hukum terhadap perkara tersebut, yakni Pasal 153 Ayat 2 Huruf b KHI, QS. At-Thalaq ayat 4, serta Pasal 53 KHI, yang diketahui berdasarkan metode penemuan hukum (rechtvinding), diantaranya: Pertama, Metode Interpretasi Sistematis digunakan untuk mengetahui masa ‘iddah W (pemohon) bukan ‘iddah hamil akan tetapi ‘iddah qurû’; Kedua, Metode A Contrario (Argumen a Contrario) terhadap Pasal 153 Ayat (2) Huruf c KHI, untuk mengetahui siapa pria yang menghamili W (pemohon), sekaligus sebagai dasar untuk mencabut surat penolakan perkawinan dari KUA; dan Ketiga, Silogisme terhadap Pasal 53 KHI, untuk mengetahui diantara W (pemohon) dengan S (calon suami) tidak ada halangan untuk melangsungkan perkawinan.Selain itu, perlu upaya preventif dan mengadvokasi masyarakat secara dini mengenai pelaksanaan perkawinan pasca perceraian terutama bagi pihak wanita yang masih dalam masa ‘iddah.
This article discusses the Determination of the Religious Court Number: 287/Pdt.P/2017/PA.TA, concerning the revocation of the marriage approval letter during the 'iddah period. Marriage during the 'iddah period cannot be legally carried out before the 'iddah period has expired, the judges will judge the others who are opposite the KUA Kedungwaru, Tulungagung Regency, the KUA is related to the candidate provoking the woman who is still pregnant. After analyzing, it turned out that the panel of judges used a legal basis that was quite strong in legal considerations on the case, the legal basis used was Article 153 Paragraph 2 Letter b KHI, QS. At-Thalaq verse 4, as well as Article 53 KHI, which is known based on the method of legal discovery (rechtvinding), as stated: First, the Systematic Interpretation Method is used to determine the period of 'iddah W (the applicant) is not 'iddah pregnant but 'iddah qurû'; Second, Method A Contrario (Argument a Contrario) on Article 153 Paragraph (2) Letter c KHI, to find out who is the man who impregnates W (the applicant), as well as the basis for revoking the marriage giving letter from KUA; and Third, syllogism towards Article 53 of KHI, to study between W (applicant) and S (prospective husband) there is no obstacle to getting married. In addition, efforts need to be made to prevent and advocate for the community at the beginning of the post-divorce marriage, especially for women who are still in their 'iddah period.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.