The ups and downs of COVID-19 were motivated by the neglect of the rule of law. China was the first country to be affected by COVID-19 as well as a country that managed to overcome it. This success is the result of the hard work of the Chinese government and its people. The theory initiated by Seidman emphasizes the existence of a good legal culture, but every rule of law that is successfully enforced in one place cannot necessarily be applied elsewhere. The purpose of this study was to find out the methods of preventing the spread of COVID-19 used by China and their relevance to other countries in the application of these methods. This is done by using Seidman's theory as an analytical knife. This research method is qualitative-normative literature-based. The results showed that China implemented a system of lockdown and Chinese Medicine (CM).Keywords: Coping with COVID-19, legal culture, Seidman's theory. AbstrakPasang-surut COVID-19 dilatarbelakangi adanya pengabaian aturan hukum. Cina merupakan negara yang pertama kali terkena dampak COVID-19 sekaligus sebagai negara yang berhasil menanggulanginya. Keberhasilan tersebut merupakan hasil dari adanya kerja keras yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Cina dan masyarakatnya. Teori yang digagas oleh Seidman menekankan adanya budaya hukum yang baik, namun setiap aturan hukum yang berhasil diberlakukan di suatu tempat tidak semerta-merta bisa terapkan oleh tempat lain. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui metode pencegahan penyebaran COVID-19 yang digunakan oleh Cina dan relevansinya dengan negara-negara lain dalam penerapan metode tersebut. Demikian dilakukan dengan menggunakan teori Seidman sebagai pisau analisis. Metode penelitian ini adalah kualitatif-normatif yang berbasis kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Cina menerapkan sistem lockdown dan Chinese Medicine (CM).Kata Kunci: Penanggulangan COVID-19, budaya hukum, teori Seidman
The purpose of this research is to describe the reality of mut’ah marriage in Indonesia by making an attempt to interpret the views of Shi’ah scholars. The discourse related to mut’ah marriage isn’t longer considered a new discuss in Indonesia. There have been several previous studies related to this problem. Starting from research that focuses on the discuss related to the legal controversy of contract marriage, efforts to compare Islamic law with positive law in Indonesia, attempts to criticize the hadith relating to the ability to implement mut’ah marriage, and research that is directly involved in the field. Basically, this opinion about the permissibility of marriage was specifically conveyed by the Shi’ah scholars. And the Sunnis generally forbiden it. This study used a qualitative approach with the library study method. The writer chose the research using the literature study method to make it easier to collect data related to the reality of the practice of mut'ah marriage in Indonesia. The research results show that: The practice of mut’ah marriage in Iran is actually regulated in a certain regulation. But, in Indonesia the marriage that are listed and protected in the regulations are marriages that are permanent (daim).
The legal realignment of the inheritance in Indonesia was legally regulated through laws passed, such as KHI and KUHpdt. Whereas legally non-constitutional acts are in accordance with living laws. When it comes to inherited religious laws, it seems too sensitive to discuss in such a haphazard way that studies of semantics should be conducted. It is therefore intended to make thematic and scientific discussion efforts, so it is hoped that the result will be a soluble consideration for addressing the different religious legacies. As for the research method, the author uses is library research by making the maqâṣîd asy-Syarîʻah yusûf al-Qarḍâwî theory one of his basic analyses. From research it is understandable that yusûf al-Qarḍâwî held the right to inherit Muslim heirs to his non-muslim properties.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.