Infections led by Acinetobacter baumannii strains are of great concern in healthcare environments due to the strong ability of the bacteria to spread through different apparatuses and develop drug resistance. Severe diseases can be caused by A. baumannii in critically ill patients, but its biological process and mechanism are not well understood. Secretion systems have recently been demonstrated to be involved in the pathogenic process, and five types of secretion systems out of the currently known six from Gram-negative bacteria have been found in A. baumannii. They can promote the fitness and pathogenesis of the bacteria by releasing a variety of effectors. Additionally, antibiotic resistance is found to be related to some types of secretion systems. In this review, we describe the genetic and structural compositions of the five secretion systems that exist in Acinetobacter. In addition, the function and molecular mechanism of each secretion system are summarized to explain how they enable these critical pathogens to overcome eukaryotic hosts and prokaryotic competitors to cause diseases.

No abstract

Acinetobacter baumannii can develop various resistance mechanisms to carbapenems. However, the factors involved in the evolutionary process that leads from transition to the sensitive to resistant phenotype are not clear.

A. baumannii biofilm is a significant virulence factor that causes the biofilm colonization of invasive illnesses. Rising bacterial resistance to synthetic antimicrobials has prompted researchers to look at natural alternatives, such as probiotics and their derivatives.

The modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute is not applicable for detecting carbapenemases in Acinetobacter baumannii. Four currently reported phenotypic detection methods, namely, the modified Hodge test, the mCIM, the adjusted mCIM, and the simplified carbapenem inactivation method (sCIM), did not perform well in our 90 clinical A. baumannii isolates. Thus, the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of carbapenems and the existence and expression of carbapenemase-encoding genes were detected to explain the results. According to the E-test, which was more accurate than the VITEK 2 system, 80.0 and 41.1% were resistant to imipenem (IPM) and meropenem (MEM), respectively, and 14.4 and 53.3% exhibited intermediate resistance, respectively. Five β-lactamase genes were found, of which blaOXA-51-like, blaTEM, and blaOXA-23-like were detected more frequently in 85 non-susceptible strains. The expression of blaOXA-23-like was positively correlated with the MIC values of IPM and MEM. Therefore, an improved approach based on the mCIM, designated the optimized CIM (oCIM), was developed in this study to detect carbapenemases more accurately and reproducibly. The condition was improved by evaluating the factors of A. baumannii inoculum, incubation broth volume, and MEM disk incubation time. Obvious high sensitivity (92.94%) and specificity (100.00%) were obtained using the oCIM, which was cost-effective and reproducible in routine laboratory work.