Although the effects of different vegetation cover on soil reinforcement due to their roots have been addressed in the literature, there remains a lack of assessment and comparison of root biomechanical properties of hardwood and softwood plantations for similar site conditions. To address this gap, two adjacent hillslopes with similar site conditions but different forest plantations, a Picea abies (softwood) and a Fraxinus excelsior (hardwood), were selected to assess and compare their effectiveness in protecting sloping soils. The profile trench method was used to obtain root distribution from both upslope and downslope sides of tree samples and on each side at two horizontal distances from the tree stems. Root tensile strength of live root samples was measured using a standard Instron Universal Testing Machine. A modified Wu and Waldron root reinforcement model was used to calculate root cohesion for the two plantations. The root tensile strength for was significantly greater for softwood than for hardwood trees (19.31 ± 2.64 vs 16.98 ± 1.01 MPa). Interestingly, the number of roots, root area ratio values, and the root tensile strength of the two species did not significantly differ between the upslope and downslope sides of trees. The results also showed a higher root cohesion for the softwood than the hardwood species (1.56 ± 0.34 vs 1.03 ± 0.21 kPa). In addition, softwood trees extended their contribution to soil protection to a larger horizontal distance compared with hardwood. However, our findings generally revealed that the values of root cohesion of both studied plantations were surprisingly lower than those found in earlier reports.
There is no detailed information about the effect of mineral biochar (MB) on soil properties and plant performance. Here, MB levels of 0, 5, … and 25% in three application methods; including mixed with the topsoil (MTS), subsoil (MSS), whole soil (MWS) were used through cultivating the Fortuynia bungei (bush), Calligonum comosum (shrub) and Ziziphus spina-christi (tree) in holes based on a completely randomized factorial design for two consecutive years in an arid region. Based on the results, even using 5% MB, a relative improvement in soil and plant properties was observed, but there was no significant difference between 20 and 25% MB application. Plant performance was significantly influenced by specie type, MB levels and application method. Using 20% MB under MWS, shrub C. comosum had the highest height and biomass production. OM, EC and pH showed the most changes, which were mostly influenced by the level of MB used (Sig.<0.001). Also, soil respiration, urease, b-glucosidase, dehydrogenase, and acid phosphatase showed an increase of 34.4, 79.1, 100.0, 65.3 and 22.5%, respectively, in comparison to its control (MB = 0). The Pearson-Kendall correlation through PCA also showed significant ecological relationships between soil-plant characteristics improvements by 15–20%MB application.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.