The binding of nine noncoding regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) to the E. coli Hfq protein was compared using a high-throughput double filter retention assay. Despite the fact that these sRNAs have different lengths, sequences and secondary structures their Hfq binding affinities were surprisingly uniform. The analysis of sRNAs binding to Hfq mutants showed that the proximal face of Hfq, known as the binding site for DsrA RNA, is a universal sRNA binding site. Moreover, all sRNAs bound Hfq with similar association rates limited only by the rate of diffusion, while the rates of dissociation, measured in the dilution experiments, were uniformly slow. Despite that, the data showed that there was a hierarchy of sRNAs in regard to their performance in competition for access to Hfq and in their ability to facilitate the dissociation of other sRNAs from Hfq. The sRNAs also differed in their salt dependence of binding to this protein. Overall, the results suggest that despite the uniform binding of different sRNAs to the same site on Hfq their exchange on this protein is dependent on the identities of the competing sRNAs.

Summary Small RNAs (sRNAs), particularly those that act by limited base pairing with mRNAs, are part of most regulatory networks in bacteria. In many cases, the base-pairing interaction is facilitated by the RNA chaperone Hfq. However, not all bacteria encode Hfq and some base-pairing sRNAs do not require Hfq raising the possibility of other RNA chaperones. Candidates are proteins with homology to FinO, a factor that promotes base pairing between the FinP antisense sRNA and the traJ mRNA to control F plasmid transfer. Recent papers have shown that the Salmonella enterica FinO-domain protein ProQ binds a large suite of sRNAs, including the RaiZ sRNA, which represses translation of the hupA mRNA, and the Legionella pneumophila protein RocC binds the RocR sRNA, which blocks expression of competence genes. Here we discuss what is known about FinO-domain structures, including the recently solved Escherichia coli ProQ structure, as well as the RNA binding properties of this family of proteins and evidence they act as chaperones. We compare these properties with those of Hfq. We further summarize what is known about the physiological roles of FinO-domain proteins and enumerate outstanding questions whose answers will establish whether they constitute a second major class of RNA chaperones.

The binding of seven tRNA anticodons to their complementary codons on Escherichia coli ribosomes was substantially impaired, as compared with the binding of their natural tRNAs, when they were transplanted into tRNA(2)(Ala). An analysis of chimeras composed of tRNA(2)(Ala) and various amounts of either tRNA(3)(Gly) or tRNA(2)(Arg) indicates that the presence of the parental 32-38 nucleotide pair is sufficient to restore ribosome binding of the transplanted anticodons. Furthermore, mutagenesis of tRNA(2)(Ala) showed that its highly conserved A32-U38 pair serves to weaken ribosome affinity. We propose that this negative binding determinant is used to offset the very tight codon-anticodon interaction of tRNA(2)(Ala). This suggests that each tRNA sequence has coevolved with its anticodon to tune ribosome affinity to a value that is the same for all tRNAs.

Mutating the rare A32-U38 nucleotide pair at the top of the anticodon loop of E. coli tRNAGGCAla to a more common U32-A38 pair results in a tRNA that performs almost normally on cognate codons but is unusually efficient in reading near-cognate codons. Pre-steady state kinetic measurements on E. coli ribosomes show that unlike the wild-type tRNAGGCAla, the misreading mutant tRNAGGCAla shows rapid GTP hydrolysis and no detectable proofreading on near-cognate codons. Similarly, tRNAGGCAla mutated to contain C32-G38, a pair which is found in some bacterial tRNAGGCAla sequences, was able to decode only the cognate codons, while tRNAGGCAla containing a more common C32-A38 pair was able to decode all cognate and near-cognate codons tested. We propose that many of the phylogenetically conserved sequence elements present in each tRNA have evolved to suppress translation of near-cognate codons.