2011
DOI: 10.1021/bi102043f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Despite Similar Binding to the Hfq Protein Regulatory RNAs Widely Differ in Their Competition Performance

Abstract: The binding of nine noncoding regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) to the E. coli Hfq protein was compared using a high-throughput double filter retention assay. Despite the fact that these sRNAs have different lengths, sequences and secondary structures their Hfq binding affinities were surprisingly uniform. The analysis of sRNAs binding to Hfq mutants showed that the proximal face of Hfq, known as the binding site for DsrA RNA, is a universal sRNA binding site. Moreover, all sRNAs bound Hfq with similar association rates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

27
106
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(236 reference statements)
27
106
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently, the sRNAs studied here do not contain ARN repeats (Fig. 1B), which direct other sRNAs to the distal face of Hfq (Olejniczak 2011;Małecka et al 2015;Schu et al 2015). Overall, these data suggest that Hfq could use the proximal surface of its ring to recruit RybB, SdsR, and MicC sRNAs toward the ompD mRNA coding sequence.…”
Section: Hfq Binds Tightly To the Ompd Mrnasupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistently, the sRNAs studied here do not contain ARN repeats (Fig. 1B), which direct other sRNAs to the distal face of Hfq (Olejniczak 2011;Małecka et al 2015;Schu et al 2015). Overall, these data suggest that Hfq could use the proximal surface of its ring to recruit RybB, SdsR, and MicC sRNAs toward the ompD mRNA coding sequence.…”
Section: Hfq Binds Tightly To the Ompd Mrnasupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The binding of Hfq to sRNAs RybB, SdsR, and MicC was mainly dependent on the proximal face contacts (Table 1). These sRNAs bound to wt Hfq with very tight affinities similar to those determined before for E. coli sRNAs (Olejniczak 2011). The Y25D mutation in the distal face of Hfq did not affect their binding, while the K56A mutation in the proximal face resulted in up to 100-fold weaker binding.…”
Section: Hfq Binds Tightly To the Ompd Mrnasupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) and improves binding of structured RNAs to the rim (Table 1), we next asked whether the CTD influences competition between different sRNAs for Hfq. The competition of sRNAs for Hfq has been attributed to a combination of sRNA secondary structure and sequence (12,35,43), and the ability of one sRNA to outcompete another does not necessarily correspond to their relative binding affinities (35,44), consistent with active displacement of bound sRNAs by other sRNAs in solution (37).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 A-C). The sRNA competitors included DsrA, a Class I sRNA that is a poor competitor (12,35,44), RyhB (Class I), RprA, which has an AAN sequence like Class II sRNAs but exhibits a mixed Class I/Class II phenotype in E. coli (31), and ChiX (Class II). The fraction of 32 P-ChiX bound to either Hfq102 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%