We explored genomic expression patterns in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae responding to diverse environmental transitions. DNA microarrays were used to measure changes in transcript levels over time for almost every yeast gene, as cells responded to temperature shocks, hydrogen peroxide, the superoxide-generating drug menadione, the sulfhydryl-oxidizing agent diamide, the disulfide-reducing agent dithiothreitol, hyper-and hypo-osmotic shock, amino acid starvation, nitrogen source depletion, and progression into stationary phase. A large set of genes (ϳ 900) showed a similar drastic response to almost all of these environmental changes. Additional features of the genomic responses were specialized for specific conditions. Promoter analysis and subsequent characterization of the responses of mutant strains implicated the transcription factors Yap1p, as well as Msn2p and Msn4p, in mediating specific features of the transcriptional response, while the identification of novel sequence elements provided clues to novel regulators. Physiological themes in the genomic responses to specific environmental stresses provided insights into the effects of those stresses on the cell.

RNA regulators in bacteria are a heterogenous group of molecules that act by various mechanisms to modulate a wide range of physiological responses. One class comprises riboswitches, which are parts of the mRNAs they regulate. These leader sequences fold into structures amenable to conformational changes upon the binding of small molecules. Riboswitches thus sense and respond to the availability of various nutrients in the cell. Other small transcripts bind to proteins, among them global regulators, and antagonize their functions. The largest and most extensively studied set of small RNA regulators act through base pairing with RNAs, usually modulating the translation and stability of mRNAs. The majority of these small RNAs regulate responses to changes in environmental conditions. Finally, a recently discovered group of RNA regulators, known as the CRISPR RNAs, contain short regions of homology to bacteriophage and plasmid sequences. CRISPR RNAs interfere with bacteriophage infection and plasmid conjugation by targeting the homologous foreign DNA through an unknown mechanism. Here we discuss what is known about these RNA regulators, as well as the many intriguing questions that remain to be addressed.

More than 70 years ago, Hobby 1 and Bigger 2 observed that antibiotics that are considered bactericidal and kill bacteria in fact fail to sterilize cultures. Bigger realized that the small number of bacteria that manage to survive intensive antibiotic treatments are a distinct subpopulation of bacteria that he named 'persisters'. Fuelled in part by increasing concerns about antibiotic resistance but also by technological advances in single-cell analyses, the past 15 years have witnessed a great deal of research on antibiotic persistence by investigators with different backgrounds and perspectives. As the number of scientists that tackle the puzzles and challenges of antibiotic persistence from many different angles has profoundly increased, it is now time to agree on the basic definition of persistence and its distinction from the other mechanisms by which bacteria survive exposure to bactericidal antibiotic treatments 3. Several approaches have independently emerged to define and measure persistence. Research groups following seemingly similar procedures may reach different results, and careful examination of the experimental procedures often reveals that results of different groups cannot be compared. During the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) Workshop 'Bacterial Persistence and Antimicrobial Therapy' (10-14 June 2018) in Ascona, Switzerland, which brought together 121 investigators involved in antibiotic persistence research from 21 countries, a discussion panel laid the main themes for a Consensus Statement on the definition and detection procedure of antibiotic persistence detailed below. In light of the potential role that antibiotic persistence can have in antibiotic treatment regimens, it is our hope that clarification and standardization of experimental procedures will facilitate the translation of basic science research into practical guidelines. Defining the persistence phenomena We adopt here a phenomenological definition of antibiotic persistence that is based on a small set of observations that can be made from experiments performed in vitro and that does not assume a specific mechanism. We focus on the differences and similarities between antibiotic persistence and other processes enabling bacteria to survive exposure to antibiotic treatments that could kill them, such as resistance, tolerance and heteroresistance. We identify different types of persistence that should be measured differently to obtain meaningful results; therefore, the definition of these types goes beyond semantics. For the more mathematically oriented readers, we provide a mathematical definition of the

Research on the discovery and characterization of small, regulatory RNAs in bacteria has exploded in recent years. These sRNAs act by base pairing with target mRNAs with which they share limited or extended complementarity, or by modulating protein activity, in some cases by mimicking other nucleic acids. Mechanistic insights into how sRNAs bind mRNAs and proteins, how they compete with each other, and how they interface with ribonucleases are active areas of discovery. Current work also has begun to illuminate how sRNAs modulate expression of distinct regulons and key transcription factors, thus integrating sRNA activity into extensive regulatory networks. In addition, the application of RNA deep sequencing has led to reports of hundreds of additional sRNA candidates in a wide swath of bacterial species. Most importantly, recent studies have served to clarify the abundance of remaining questions about how, when and why sRNA-mediated regulation is of such importance to bacterial lifestyles.

The OxyR transcription factor is sensitive to oxidation and activates the expression of antioxidant genes in response to hydrogen peroxide in Escherichia coli. Genetic and biochemical studies revealed that OxyR is activated through the formation of a disulfide bond and is deactivated by enzymatic reduction with glutaredoxin 1 (Grx1). The gene encoding Grx1 is regulated by OxyR, thus providing a mechanism for autoregulation. The redox potential of OxyR was determined to be -185 millivolts, ensuring that OxyR is reduced in the absence of stress. These results represent an example of redox signaling through disulfide bond formation and reduction.

Much has been learnt about oxidative stress from studies of Escherichia coli. Key regulators of the adaptive responses in this organism are the SoxRS and OxyR transcription factors, which induce the expression of antioxidant activities in response to O2*- and H2O2 stress, respectively. Recently, a variety of biochemical assays together with the characterization of strains carrying mutations affecting the antioxidant activities and the regulators have given general insights into the sources of oxidative stress, the damage caused by oxidative stress, defenses against the oxidative stress, and the mechanisms by which the stress is perceived. These studies have also shown that the oxidative stress responses are intimately coupled to other regulatory networks in the cell.

The genome-wide transcription profile of Escherichia coli cells treated with hydrogen peroxide was examined with a DNA microarray composed of 4,169 E. coli open reading frames. By measuring gene expression in isogenic wild-type and oxyR deletion strains, we confirmed that the peroxide response regulator OxyR activates most of the highly hydrogen peroxide-inducible genes. The DNA microarray measurements allowed the identification of several new OxyR-activated genes, including the hemH heme biosynthetic gene; the six-gene suf operon, which may participate in Fe-S cluster assembly or repair; and four genes of unknown function. We also identified several genes, including uxuA, encoding mannonate hydrolase, whose expression might be repressed by OxyR, since their expression was elevated in the ⌬oxyR mutant strain. In addition, the induction of some genes was found to be OxyR independent, indicating the existence of other peroxide sensors and regulators in E. coli. For example, the isc operon, which specifies Fe-S cluster formation and repair activities, was induced by hydrogen peroxide in strains lacking either OxyR or the superoxide response regulators SoxRS. These results expand our understanding of the oxidative stress response and raise interesting questions regarding the nature of other regulators that modulate gene expression in response to hydrogen peroxide.

Correspondence: susang@helix.nih.gov and storz@helix.nih.gov SUMMARY Small RNA regulators (sRNAs) have been identified in a wide range of bacteria and found to play critical regulatory roles in many processes. The major families of sRNAs include true antisense RNAs, synthesized from the strand complementary to the mRNA they regulate, sRNAs that also act by pairing but have limited complementarity with their targets, and sRNAs that regulate proteins by binding to and affecting protein activity. The sRNAs with limited complementarity are akin to eukaryotic microRNAs in their ability to modulate the activity and stability of multiple mRNAs. In many bacterial species, the RNA chaperone Hfq is required to promote pairing between these sRNAs and their target mRNAs. Understanding the evolution of regulatory sRNAs remains a challenge; sRNA genes show evidence of duplication and horizontal transfer but also could be evolved from tRNAs, mRNAs or random transcription.