Key PointsQuestionDoes the use of adjunct intra-arterial thrombolysis following an angiographically successful thrombectomy improve functional outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke?FindingsIn this randomized clinical trial that included 121 adults, treatment with intra-arterial alteplase compared with placebo resulted in a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 in 59.0% vs 40.4% of patients at 90 days. This difference was statistically significant.MeaningAmong patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke and successful reperfusion following thrombectomy, the use of adjunct intra-arterial alteplase compared with placebo resulted in a greater likelihood of excellent neurological outcome at 90 days; however, the findings should be considered preliminary until replicated.

The studied biomarkers were not sufficient for an accurate differential diagnosis of stroke in the hyperacute setting. Additional discovery of new biomarkers and improvement on laboratory techniques seem necessary for achieving a molecular diagnosis of stroke.

Arterial recanalization to restore the blood supply and limit the brain damage is the primary goal in the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Since the publication of pivotal randomized clinical trials in 2015, endovascular thrombectomy has become part of the standard of care in selected cases of AIS from large-vessel occlusions up to 6 hours after the onset of symptoms. However, the association between endovascular reperfusion and improved functional outcome is not strictly time dependent. Rather than on rigid time windows, candidates should be selected based on vascular and physiologic information. This approach places imaging data at the center of treatment decisions. Advances in imaging-based management of AIS provide crucial information about vessel occlusion, infarct core, ischemic penumbra, and degree of collaterals. This information is invaluable in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from reperfusion therapies and excluding those who are unlikely to benefit or are at risk of adverse effects. The approach to reperfusion therapies continues to evolve, and imaging is acquiring a greater role in the diagnostic work-up and treatment decisions as shown in recent clinical trials with extended time window. The 2018 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines reflect a paradigm shift in the management of AIS from "Time is Brain" to "Imaging is Brain." This review discusses the essential role of multimodal imaging developing from recent trials on therapy for AIS.

No abstract

Objective: Blood biomarkers have not been widely investigated in poststroke epilepsy. In this study, we aimed to describe clinical factors and biomarkers present during acute stroke and analyze their association with the development of epilepsy at long term. Methods: A panel of 14 blood biomarkers was evaluated in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Biomarkers were normalized and standardized using Zscores. Stroke and epilepsy-related variables were also assessed: stroke severity, determined by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, stroke type and cause, time from stroke to onset of late seizures, and type of seizure. Multiple Cox regression models were used to identify clinical variables and biomarkers independently associated with epilepsy.

Background Carotid cavernous fistulas (CCFs) Barrow type 'B' are dural shunts between the meningeal branches of the internal carotid artery and the cavernous sinus. The symptoms include vision deterioration, ophthalmoplegia with diplopia, exophthalmos, conjunctival injection, chemosis, ocular bruit, seizures, or neurological deficit. Endovascular treatment remains the gold standard for treatment through the transvenous or transarterial routes. The transvenous approaches have been proved to be the first option. Endovascular access through the superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) or inferior petrosal sinus have been widely used. The problem arises when there is no vascular access. For these cases, different approaches have been described, such as: direct access to the SOV; combining direct access to the SOV along with blind probing of the proximal occluded SOV; and a direct puncture of the cavernous sinus. But these techniques are very aggressive and can cause serious complications. As a result of the above, we describe a new alternative technique, which is effective and less invasive for the treatment of these special cases. Case reports We report two cases of Barrow type 'B' CCFs that did not have vascular access (neither arterial nor venous) to embolise fistulas with coils or glue, and which were successfully resolved with a flow diverter (Pipeline) stent in the internal carotid artery. To our knowledge, this treatment has not previously been described for this pathology. Conclusions The placement of a flow diverter stent in the internal carotid artery is an effective alternative technique in those cases of Barrow type 'B' CCFs that have no vascular access (neither venous nor arterial).

Background and Purpose: Improving prehospital triage of large vessel occlusion (LVO) would reduce time to reperfusion therapies. We aimed to study early predictors of LVO in acute ischemic stroke to identify candidates for endovascular treatment. Methods: The Stroke-Chip was a prospective observational study conducted at 6 Stroke Centers in Catalonia. Blood samples were obtained in the first 6 hours from symptom onset of consecutive patients. Stroke severity was evaluated with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and LVO was assessed. Independent association of multiple blood biomarkers with LVO was evaluated using logistic regression models adjusted by covariates. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were assessed for NIHSS and the combination of NIHSS and selected serum biomarkers levels. Results: One thousand three hundred eight suspected strokes were enrolled for a 17-month period. LVO was not assessed in 131 patients. One thousand one hundred seventy-seven patients were selected for analysis (mean age 69.3 years, 56% men, median baseline NIHSS of 6, and median time to blood collection 2.5 hours). LVO was detected in 262 patients. LVO patients were older, had higher baseline NIHSS, history of atrial fibrillation, and lower time from stroke onset to admission. After logistic regression analysis, D-dimer remained an independent predictor of LVO (odds ratio, 1.59 [1.31–1.92]). Specificity and positive predictive value to exclude or detect LVO were higher when using combined D-dimer levels and NIHSS score assessment rather than NIHSS alone. Conclusions: Early D-dimer levels are an independent predictor of LVO and may be useful to better optimize prehospital patient transport to the appropriate stroke center.

Background The impact of general anesthesia on functional outcome in patients with large vessel occlusion remains unclear. Most studies have focused on anterior circulation large vessel occlusion; however, little is known about the effect of general anesthesia in patients with posterior circulation—large vessel occlusion. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis from the prospective CICAT registry. All patients with posterior circulation—large vessel occlusion—and undergoing endovascular therapy between January 2016 and January 2020 were included. Demographics, baseline characteristics, procedural data, and anesthesia modality (general anesthesia or conscious sedation) were evaluated. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) at three months. Results 298 patients underwent endovascular treatment with posterior circulation—large vessel occlusion—were included. Age, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, puncture to recanalization length, ≥3 device passes, absent of successful recanalization (defined as treatment in cerebral ischemia of 3), and general anesthesia were statistically associated with poor outcome (mRS: 3-6). In the multivariable regression, general anesthesia and ≥3 device passes were independently associated with poor outcome (aOR: 3.11, (95% CI: 1.34–7.2); P = 0.01 and 3.77, (95% CI: 1.29–11.01); P = 0.02, respectively). Patients treated with general anesthesia were less likely to have a good outcome at three months compared to conscious sedation (19.7% vs. 45.1%, P < 0.001). Conclusions In our study population, general anesthesia use is associated with poor clinical outcome in patients with posterior circulation—large vessel occlusion—treated endovascularly.