2017
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.017076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis of Stroke

Abstract: The studied biomarkers were not sufficient for an accurate differential diagnosis of stroke in the hyperacute setting. Additional discovery of new biomarkers and improvement on laboratory techniques seem necessary for achieving a molecular diagnosis of stroke.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
60
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[ [25][26][27][28] NSE and S100B are considered as biomarkers of glial cell damage or neuronal damage in patients with stroke or injury of the CNS. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Increased blood concentrations of NSE and/or S100B occur after hypoxia, hemorrhage, and injury to the CNS and always indicate that the BBB has been damaged. [38,39] We obtained a positive correlation between the presence of NSE and a worse neurological status on the first day, and between S100B and a poor status on the first and 30th day of stroke, which is consistent with the observations reported by other authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ [25][26][27][28] NSE and S100B are considered as biomarkers of glial cell damage or neuronal damage in patients with stroke or injury of the CNS. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Increased blood concentrations of NSE and/or S100B occur after hypoxia, hemorrhage, and injury to the CNS and always indicate that the BBB has been damaged. [38,39] We obtained a positive correlation between the presence of NSE and a worse neurological status on the first day, and between S100B and a poor status on the first and 30th day of stroke, which is consistent with the observations reported by other authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous measurement of multiple biomarkers in a single panel has been proposed, combined with recent developments in genomics and proteomics, approaches which have not yet been taken in END. However, as reported by the StrokeChip study following evaluation of an assay panel for stroke diagnosis, many biomarkers are not independent of one another and may not be significantly better than clinical judgement and radiological data [63]. Amongst investigations, which are already routinely available clinically, the results of the meta-analysis suggest that it would be reasonable to increase monitoring intensity for those acute stroke patients where venipuncture reveals a low haemoglobin or elevated glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, urea, osmolality, CRP, ESR or leucocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the applicability of this to the pre-hospital setting is currently unconfirmed. There are many other candidate stroke diagnostic biomarkers [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65]. Inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines may have utility in diagnosing ischaemia [62][63][64][65], but may not be useful in the hyper-acute phase due to their late temporality after stroke onset [63][64][65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%