2017
DOI: 10.1177/1971400917695319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Barrow type ‘B’ carotid cavernous fistulas with flow diverter stent (Pipeline)

Abstract: Background Carotid cavernous fistulas (CCFs) Barrow type 'B' are dural shunts between the meningeal branches of the internal carotid artery and the cavernous sinus. The symptoms include vision deterioration, ophthalmoplegia with diplopia, exophthalmos, conjunctival injection, chemosis, ocular bruit, seizures, or neurological deficit. Endovascular treatment remains the gold standard for treatment through the transvenous or transarterial routes. The transvenous approaches have been proved to be the first option.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been many publications on the treatment of direct CCFs (Barrow type A) using a flow diverter alone or as an adjunct to coils or Onyx embolization. Flow diverters have also been used to treat Barrow type B CCFs6 and fistulas developing secondary to cavernous ICA aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment 7. In the study by Wendl et al 4 only five out of 14 patients could be successfully treated using a flow diverter alone 4…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many publications on the treatment of direct CCFs (Barrow type A) using a flow diverter alone or as an adjunct to coils or Onyx embolization. Flow diverters have also been used to treat Barrow type B CCFs6 and fistulas developing secondary to cavernous ICA aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment 7. In the study by Wendl et al 4 only five out of 14 patients could be successfully treated using a flow diverter alone 4…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in the past, detachable balloons, polyvinyl alcohol, silk sutures and microspheres were used for treatment of cerebral AVM and dAVFs they have been widely replaced by current embolic agents, including n -butyl-2-cyanoacrylate ( n -BCA, glue, Trufill, DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA), Onyx (ev3 Endovascular, Irvine, CA), Squid (Emboflu, Switzerland), precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid (PHIL; MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, California) and detachable microcoils. Recent advancements have introduced newer embolic agents, such as PHIL12 and Squid (Emboflu),13 and flow diverters, such as the pipeline embolisation device (Medtronic Neurovascular, Irvine, California), to treat AVFs and inhibit fistula recanalisation in special scenarios,14 as described by Castãno et al with the treatment of two Barrow type B indirect carotid cavernous fistula (CCF), a version of dAVF. Classic approaches described for endovascular treatment of dAVFs include transarterial, transvenous or a combination of both techniques.…”
Section: Endovascular Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While flow-diverting stents have been used to treat direct CCFs,31 there is limited efficacy for treatment of the most common dAVF because of lesion complexity including multiple arterial feeders’ origins (ECAs, ICAs and vertebral arteries). However, Castãno and colleagues reported two cases of indirect CCF (Barrow type B), a version of dAVF in which all arterial feeders were originated from ICA, that were successfully treated with the Pipeline Flex embolisation device with shield technology (Medtronic) 14. Endothelialisation of the flow-diverting stent allowed for occlusion of the many arterial branches feeding the fistula.…”
Section: Transarterial Embolisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] и открыло новую эру в лечении данной патологии. Методика их применения заключается во введении сдутого баллона непосредственно в дефект ВСА с последующим его раздутием до размера, превышающего дефект артерии, для того чтобы предупредить миграцию в просвет ВСА, после чего баллон отделяется от микрокатетера [7,[9][10][11]. Преимуществом данной методики является возможность быстрого закрытия фистулы, однако некоторые авторы [6] также обращают внимание на невозможность адекватного использования баллона в случае слишком большого или малого размера артериального дефекта, вследствие чего доставка баллона непосредственно в дефект может быть затруднена.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Вместе с тем разработка в дальнейшем более гибких стентов может привести к доминированию этого метода благодаря его простоте и быстроте выключения соустья [18]. Для лечения ККС также предложена методика установки в просвет ВСА потокоперенаправляющего стента [2], однако некоторые авторы склоняются к мнению, что данный метод более подходит для лечения непрямых низкопотоковых соустий [10].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified