Asymmetric multi-core architectures have recently emerged as a promising alternative in a power and thermal constrained environment. They typically integrate cores with different power and performance characteristics, which makes mapping of workloads to appropriate cores a challenging task. Limited number of performance counters and heterogeneous memory hierarchy increase the difficulty in predicting the performance and power consumption across cores in commercial asymmetric multi-core architectures. In this work, we propose a software-based modeling technique that can estimate performance and power consumption of workloads for different core types. We evaluate the accuracy of our technique on ARM big.LITTLE asymmetric multi-core platform.
Abstract-Multi-cores have become ubiquitous both in the general-purpose computing and the embedded domain. The current technology trends show that the number of on-chip cores is rapidly increasing, while their complexity is decreasing due to power and thermal constraints. Increasing number of simple cores enable parallel applications benefit from abundant threadlevel parallelism (TLP), while sequential fragments suffer from poor exploitation of instruction-level parallelism (ILP). Recent research has proposed adaptive multi-core architectures that are capable of coalescing simple physical cores to create more complex virtual cores so as to accelerate sequential code. Such adaptive architectures can seamlessly exploit both ILP and TLP.The goal of this paper is to quantitatively characterize the performance potential of adaptive multi-core architectures. Previous research have primarily focused on only sequential workload on adaptive multi-cores. We address a more realistic scenario where parallel and sequential applications co-exist on an adaptive multi-core platform. Scheduling tasks on adaptive architectures reveals challenging resource allocation problems for the existing schedulers. We construct offline and online schedulers that intelligently reconfigure and allocate the cores to the applications so as to minimize the overall makespan under the constraints of a realistic adaptive multi-core architecture. Experimental results reveal that adaptive multi-core architectures can substantially decrease the makespan compared to both static symmetric and asymmetric multi-core architectures.
Computing systems have made an irreversible transition towards parallel architectures with the emergence of multi-cores. Moreover, power and thermal limits in embedded systems mandate the deployment of many simpler cores rather than a few complex cores on chip. Consumer electronic devices, on the other hand, need to support an ever-changing set of diverse applications with varying performance demands. While some applications can benefit from thread-level parallelism offered by multi-core solutions, there still exist a large number of applications with substantial amount of sequential code. The sequential programs suffer from limited exploitation of instruction-level parallelism in simple cores. We propose a reconfigurable multicore architecture, called Bahurupi, that can successfully reconcile the conflicting demands of instruction-level and thread-level parallelism. Bahurupi can accelerate the performance of serial code by dynamically forming coalition of two or more simple cores to offer increased instruction-level parallelism. In particular, Bahurupi can efficiently merge 2-4 simple 2-way out-of-order cores to reach or even surpass the performance of more complex and power-hungry 4-way or 8-way out-of-order core. Compared to baseline 2-way core, quad-core Bahurupi achieves up to 5.61 speedup (average 4.08 speedup) for embedded workloads. On an average, quad-core Bahurupi achieves 17% performance improvement and 43% improvement in energy consumption compared to 8-way out-of-order baseline core on a diverse set of embedded benchmark applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.