Seventeen patients with sleep apnea syndrome [SAS, Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) = 12-85] were compared with 16 normal controls (RDI < 7) on neuropsychological tests of executive functions, a domain in which SAS patients have been suggested to have deficits. SAS patients demonstrated greater deficits in the retrieval of information from semantic memory (Controlled Oral Word Association task) and in shifting responses in the face of error (Wisconsin Card Sort Test), but differences in working memory were not observed. Eliciting deficits in cognitive executive functions in SAS may require more sensitive measures than are typically used in neuropsychiatric research.
As in a previous report, there was a relationship between premorbid personality and depressive symptoms in AD, but only when personality and symptom information was obtained from the same informant. On the other hand, there was a relationship between premorbid personality and severity of anxiety symptoms both when personality and symptom information came from different informants as well as from the same informant. These data suggest that retrospective bias contributes to the apparent consistency between premorbid personality and some aspects of psychiatric symptoms in AD, specifically depression.
Dental practitioners transitioning to dental educators (PTEs) have an integral role in dental education. While PTEs intrinsically apply some form of evidence-based dentistry (EBD) in patient care, it may not be a standardized, systematic approach. The aims of this study were to determine the self-perceived knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors of PTEs regarding EBD at one U.S. dental school and to identify areas where formal calibration may be warranted to facilitate their competence and confidence as dental educators. Participants voluntarily completed a 32-question survey regarding their EBD training and selfperceived EBD skills in several areas: use of the clinical evidence pyramid; systematic, objective, and critical appraisal of the evidence; application of the evidence to patient care; and integrating clinical expertise, scientific evidence, and patient's preferences to formulate a treatment plan. The PTEs were invited to participate in the anonymous survey during regularly scheduled calibration sessions held between May and July 2014. After study information was distributed, 100% of the attendees (n=43) completed the survey. The percentage of total PTEs at the school could not be calculated. Of the responding PTEs, 69% rated themselves better than satisfactory (70% proficiency) in their knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding EBD skills application. However, only 33-42% of the respondents indicated that they frequently used the evidence pyramid and systematically, objectively, and critically appraised the evidence, even though 65% indicated they applied the evidence to improve patient care over 70% of the time. In addition, the participating PTEs identified a need for more frequent use of formal EBD skills. Providing case-based EBD projects involving PTEs as mentors may provide more opportunities for the judicious and effective use of these important skills and may improve PTEs' self-perceived confidence.
What are people’s expectations of interracial political coalitions? This research reveals expectations of flexible interracial coalitions stemming from how policies and racial groups are viewed in terms of perceived status and foreignness. For policies seen as changing societal status (e.g., welfare), people expected Black-Hispanic political coalitions and viewed Asian Americans as more likely to align with Whites than with other minorities. For policies seen as relating to American identity (e.g., immigration), people expected Asian-Hispanic coalitions and that Black Americans would align with Whites more than other minorities. Manipulating a novel group’s alleged status and cultural assimilation influenced coalitional expectations, providing evidence of causality. These expectations appear to better reflect stereotypes than groups’ actual average policy attitudes and voting behavior. Yet these beliefs may have implications for a diversifying electorate, as Whites strategically enhanced the political voice of a racial group expected to agree with their personal preferences on stereotyped policies.
OBJECTIVES To evaluate clonidine for preventing withdrawal from dexmedetomidine infusions and describe the incidence of withdrawal symptoms and adverse cardiovascular effects in critically ill pediatric patients. METHODS Retrospective, descriptive study of patients in Advocate Children's Hospital-Park Ridge PICU who received dexmedetomidine infusion for ≥72 hours, followed by clonidine for ≥48 hours, between January 1, 2015, and August 31, 2017. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients (median age 4.3 years; IQR, 2–11.5) received 39 dexmedetomidine courses. The median duration of dexmedetomidine exposure was 7.6 days (IQR, 5–11.5) at an average dose of 1 mcg/kg/hr. The median dose of clonidine at initiation was 8.3 mcg/kg/day (for <50 kg) and 4.1 mcg/kg/day (for ≥50 kg). The most common oral administration frequency was every 8 hours. Dexmedetomidine infusions for 7 days or longer and a higher dexmedetomidine dose 24 hours prior to clonidine transition both correlated with increased initial clonidine doses. Fourteen patients (37%) had at least 1 WAT-1 score of ≥3 during the transition between dexmedetomidine and clonidine, with 7 (18%) requiring an increase in sedation. Adverse cardiovascular events were possibly attributable to dexmedetomidine and/or clonidine in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving prolonged infusions of dexmedetomidine may transition to clonidine to help prevent withdrawal symptoms. Duration of dexmedetomidine infusion of 7 days or longer and higher average dexmedetomidine dose 24 hours prior to the transition are important considerations when determining the initial clonidine dose. Transition from dexmedetomidine to clonidine was found to be safe and efficacious in our patients, with minimal adverse effects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.