The Consensus Group deliberated on a number of questions concerning urine and stone analysis over a period of months, and then met to develop consensus. The Group concluded that analyses of urine and stones should be routine in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stone diseases. At present, the 24-h urine is the most useful type of urine collection, and accepted methods for analysis are described. Patient education is also important for obtaining a proper urine sample. Graphical methods for reporting urine analysis results can be helpful both for the physician and for educating the patient as to proper dietary changes that could be beneficial. Proper analysis of stones is also essential for diagnosis and management of patients. The Consensus Group also agreed that research has shown that evaluation of urinary crystals could be very valuable, but the Group also recognizes that existing methods for assessment of crystalluria do not allow this to be part of stone treatment in many places.
1. The serum oxalate concentration rises in chronic renal failure and it is only partially eliminated by regular dialysis treatment. However, the recent literature is not conclusive on whether progressive oxalate retention and secondary oxalosis should be expected in patients on regular dialysis treatment. 2. To further investigate this, we have estimated the state of saturation with respect to calcium oxalate mono-hydrate in plasma ultrafiltrates from 28 patients on maintenance haemodialysis and eight healthy control subjects, matched for sex and age. Five patients had type I primary hyperoxaluria and histologically proven oxalosis, whereas 23 had oxalosis-unrelated renal diseases. Dialysis efficiency was quantified as the KdTd/V of urea. Samples were obtained from each patient before, immediately after and 48 h after a dialysis session. Fasting samples were obtained from the control subjects. Oxalate was determined in both plasma ultrafiltrates and the whole dialysate by ion-exchange chromatography, after a non-delayed and [14C]oxalate-recovery-controlled procedure. The state of saturation with calcium oxalate monohydrate was estimated by means of a computer system which solved the interactions among 45 complex species. 3. The fasting plasma oxalate concentration (means ± sd) in ultrafiltrates from healthy subjects was 3.8 ± 1.5 (range 1.4–5.8) μmol/l, and the state of saturation with calcium oxalate monohydrate was 0.096 ± 0.04. The 23 patients with oxalosis-unrelated chronic renal failure had a pre-dialysis plasma oxalate concentration of 49.8 ± 14.0 μmol/l, which yielded a state of saturation with calcium oxalate monohydrate of 1.0 ± 0.3; dialysis produced a steep decrease in the state of saturation with calcium oxalate monohydrate and the samples remained undersaturated at 48 h from the end of the session. The pre-dialysis oxalate concentration in plasma ultrafiltrates from patients with primary oxalosis was 170 ± 21 μmol/l, so as to exceed saturation by more than threefold. The samples remained above saturation even at the end of dialysis. 4. In 116 ultrafiltrates the state of saturation with calcium oxalate monohydrate was closely dependent on the plasma oxalate concentration but not on the plasma calcium concentration. The pre-dialysis state of saturation with calcium oxalate monohydrate was poorly influenced by the residual renal function and was independent of the sex, age, body weight or time on dialysis. 5. The results of the present study suggest that, unless chronic renal failure is due to primary hyperoxaluria, the extracellular body fluid of patients on current dialysis is often undersaturated with calcium oxalate and this is inconsistent with progressive oxalate accumulation and secondary systemic oxalosis. However, since some tissues may generate or selectively accumulate oxalate, local formation of crystalline deposits may still occur on regular haemodialysis.
Oxalate retention occurs in end-stage renal failure. Regular dialysis treatment does not prevent progressive accumulation of oxalate in cases of ESRF due to primary hyperoxaluria (PH), whereas such accumulation seldom seems to occur in oxalosis-unrelated ESRF. To elucidate this issue we have measured the bony content of oxalate on biopsies of the iliac crest taken from 32 uremic patients, 7 of them with ESRF associated with PH1 (6 cases) or PH2 (1 case). Ten subjects with normal renal function and no evidence of metabolic bone disease were taken as controls. Only trace amounts levels of oxalate were detected in normal subjects and oxalate to phosphate ratio was below 3:10,000. Non-PH dialyzed patients exhibited fivefold increases in oxalate levels, which rose to 5.1 +/- 3.6 mumol/g bony tissue. Calcium oxalate was estimated to represent 0.18% of the hydroxyapatite content of bone. Oxalate amounts were neither related to pre-dialysis plasma levels of oxalate, nor with duration of dialysis treatment, suggesting that accumulation was not progressive disorder. Oxalate levels were slightly higher in patients with a low turnover osteodystrophy compared to those with a high turnover pattern. Dialyzed patients with PH had remarkable increases in oxalate levels, which ranged between 14.8 and 907 mumol/g bony tissue. Oxalate deposition appeared to be progressive in that oxalate levels were significantly related to time on dialysis. In three patients calcium oxalate was a significant fraction of the mineralized bone. The occurrence of calcium oxalate crystals affected the histomorphometric patterns, that were featured by an increase in resorptive areas and a decrease in bone formation rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
An enzyme-spectrophotometric method to determine citrate in biological fluids is proposed, based on citrate lyase-catalyzed and phenylhydrazine reactions. The enzyme converts citrate into oxaloacetate, which, in the presence of phenylhydrazine, is transformed into the corresponding phenylhydrazone. The ultraviolet-absorbing product is determined by absorbance measurement at 330 nm. The method is more precise and twice as sensitive as the traditional citrate lyase method and, because it does not require the use of additional enzymes and coenzymes, is cheaper and simpler. Mean analytical recovery of citrate averaged 100.7% +/- 2.2%, imprecision (CV) of the assay for citrate at 0.96 mmol/L (urine) was 2.0%, and the lower limit of quantification was 0.08 mmol/L. Results correlated well with those by both ion-chromatographic and traditional citrate lyase methods.
It is currently agreed that stone formation in the urinary tract requires supersaturation with respect to a given solid phase. However, this principle fully applies only to stones other than calcium-containing stones, in which case compounds acting as inhibitors are postulated to naturally occur in urine. Stone formation would therefore ensue from an imbalance between promoters and inhibitors. The saturation state can be estimated by means of computer model systems based on ab initio calculations, which account for the main soluble complexes formed in urine between relevant cations and anions. This estimates the overall promoting potential of urine. However, in the case of calcium nephrolithiasis, supersaturation does not make a clear-cut separation between normal subjects and patients. Several studies in the last two decades have identified many inhibitors of calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate crystallization, which are classified into the ionic and macromolecular. They have been shown to act on kinetics by interfering with nucleation, growth and aggregation of crystals. Unfortunately, except for citrate, none of the newly discovered substances has been definitely characterized in its molecular composition and structure, type and potency of inhibition, differences in concentration and structure between stone-forming and non stone-forming subjects. Citrate exhibits a dual action in urine, opposing crystal formation by both thermodynamic and kinetic mechanisms. At present it is the only natural inhibitor which can be measured in urine, quantitated as to inhibitory activity and used in medical treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.