No abstract

Biomineralization is a dynamic, complex, lifelong process by which living organisms control precipitations of inorganic nanocrystals within organic matrices to form unique hybrid biological tissues, for example, enamel, dentin, cementum, and bone. Understanding the process of mineral deposition is important for the development of treatments for mineralization-related diseases and also for the innovation and development of scaffolds. This review provides a thorough overview of the up-to-date information on the theories describing the possible mechanisms and the factors implicated as agonists and antagonists of mineralization. Then, the role of calcium and phosphate ions in the maintenance of teeth and bone health is described. Throughout the life, teeth and bone are at risk of demineralization, with particular emphasis on teeth, due to their anatomical arrangement and location. Teeth are exposed to food, drink, and the microbiota of the mouth; therefore, they have developed a high resistance to localized demineralization that is unmatched by bone. The mechanisms by which demineralization–remineralization process occurs in both teeth and bone and the new therapies/technologies that reverse demineralization or boost remineralization are also scrupulously discussed. Technologies discussed include composites with nano- and micron-sized inorganic minerals that can mimic mechanical properties of the tooth and bone in addition to promoting more natural repair of surrounding tissues. Turning these new technologies to products and practices would improve health care worldwide.

No abstract

The use of cemented distal femoral massive bone tumor prostheses with a hydroxyapatite-coated collar located at the shoulder of the implant was followed by a low (8%) rate of revision due to aseptic loosening. The use of hydroxyapatite grooved collars may lead to osteointegration of the implant shoulder (collar) and may reduce the rate of aseptic loosening.

W e investigated the implant-bone interface around one design of femoral stem, proximally coated with either a plasma-sprayed porous coating (plain porous) or a hydroxyapatite porous coating (porous HA), or which had been grit-blasted (Interlok). Of 165 patients implanted with a Bimetric hip hemiarthroplasty (Biomet, Bridgend, UK) specimens were retrieved from 58 at post-mortem.We estimated ingrowth and attachment of bone to the surface of the implant in 21 of these, eight plain porous, seven porous HA and six Interlok, using image analysis and light morphometric techniques. The amount of HA coating was also quantified.There was significantly more ingrowth (p = 0.012) and attachment of bone (p < 0.05) to the porous HA surface (mean bone ingrowth 29.093 ± 2.019%; mean bone attachment 37.287 ± 2.489%) than to the plain porous surface (mean bone ingrowth 21.762 ± 2.068%; mean bone attachment 18.9411 ± 1.971%). There was no significant difference in attachment between the plain porous and Interlok surfaces. Bone grew more evenly over the surface of the HA coating whereas on the porous surface, bone ingrowth and attachment occurred more on the distal and medial parts of the coated surface. No significant differences in the volume of HA were found with the passage of time.This study shows that HA coating increases the amount of ingrowth and attachment of bone and leads to a more even distribution of bone over the surface of the implant. This may have implications in reducing stress shielding and limiting osteolysis induced by wear particles. The use of hydroxyapatite (HA) coating has been advocated in order to increase the attachment of bone to metal implants. Many animal as well as clinical studies have demonstrated the osseoconductive properties of HA and the results at six to eight years are excellent.1,2 Bone apposition appears to be well advanced as early as three weeks, 3 and some studies have shown it to be greater than 90% at 96 weeks. 4 Although there is concern that HA resorbs with time and that the release of HA debris may have adverse effects, 5 the clinical results reported so far for HA-coated components suggest that at present this is not a significant problem. Several reports of the outcome after the insertion of porous-coated uncemented implants have shown good results.6-8 Most studies found some degree of bone ingrowth into the pores 9-12 with the mean extent reported to be in the range of 5% 9,12 to 39.2% 13 of the available pore volume. An HA coating has been advocated in order to reduce the effects of debonding and to encourage bone ingrowth and attachment to a porous surface. Several studies have examined the use of an HA surface coating on porous-coated implants. Some have reported that there is no clinical advantage 14 while others have demonstrated a significant increase in bone ingrowth. 15,16 We have investigated bone ingrowth and attachment to an HA-coated porous titanium surface, a plain porous titanium surface and a roughened titanium (Interlok) surface finish in one femoral design from s...

Bone loss caused by stress shielding of metallic implants is a concern, as it can potentially lead to long-term implant failure. Surface coating and reducing structural stiffness of implants are two ways to improve bone ingrowth and osteointegration. Additive manufacturing, through selective laser sintering (SLS) or electron beam melting (EBM) of metallic alloys, can produce porous implants with bone ingrowth regions that enhance osteointegration and improve clinical outcomes. Histology of porous Ti6Al4V plugs of two pore sizes with and without electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coating, implanted in ovine condyles, showed that bone formation did not penetrate deep into the porous structure, whilst significantly increased bone growth along coated pore surfaces (osteointegration) was observed. Finite Element simulations, combining new algorithms to model bone ingrowth and the effect of surface modification on osteoconduction, were verified with the histology results. The results showed stress shielding of porous implants made from conventional titanium alloy due to material stiffness and implant geometry, limiting ingrowth and osteointegration. Simulations for reduced implant material stiffness predicted increased bone ingrowth. For low modulus Titanium-tantalum alloy (Ti-70%Ta), reduced stress shielding and enhanced bone ingrowth into the porous implant was found, leading to improved mechanical interlock. Algorithms predicted osteoconductive coating to promote both osteointegration and bone ingrowth into the inner pores when they were coated. These new Finite Element algorithms show that using implant materials with lower elastic modulus, osteoconductive coatings or improved implant design could lead to increased bone remodelling that optimises tissue regeneration, fulfilling the potential of enhanced porosity and complex implant designs made possible by additive layer manufacturing techniques.

No abstract

We have developed a laser-textured superhydrophilic Ti-6Al-4V surface with unique surface chemistry and topography that substantially promotes osteoblast adhesion in culture. Here we investigate the osteointegration of laser-textured implants in an ovine model. Our hypothesis was that laser-textured implants, without any surface coating (LT), would encourage comparable amounts of bone-implant contact and interfacial strength when compared with widely accepted hydroxyapatite (HA) coated implants. Additionally, we hypothesized that LT would significantly increase bony integration compared with machine-finished (MF) and grit-blasted (GB) implants. Forty-eight tapered transcortical pins were implanted into six sheep. Four experimental groups (LT, HA, MF and GB) were investigated(n = 12) and implants remained in vivo for 6 weeks. Bone apposition rates, interfacial shear strength and bone-implant contact (BIC) were quantified. The interfacial strength of LT and HA implants were found to be significantly greater than GB (p=0.032 and p=0.004) and MF (p=0.004 and p=0.004 respectively), but no significant difference between LT and HA implants was observed. Significantly increased BIC was measured adjacent to HA implants when compared with both LT and GB implant surfaces (p=0.022 and p=0.006 respectively). No significant difference was found when LT and GB implants were 3 compared. However, all surface finishes encouraged significantly increased BIC when compared with the MF surface.Clinical Significance: Maximising implant fixation to host bone is vital for its long-term success. The production of an LT surface is a simple and cheap manufacturing process and this study demonstrated that laser-textured implants are a very promising technical development that warrants further research.