Background: Hindfoot alignment on 2D radiographs can present anatomical and operator-related bias. In this study, software designed for weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) was used to calculate a new 3D biometric tool: the Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO). We described the distribution of FAO in a series of data sets from clinically normal, varus, and valgus cases, hypothesizing that FAO values would be significantly different in the 3 groups. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 135 data sets (57 normal, 38 varus, 40 valgus) from WBCT (PedCAT; CurveBeam LLC, Warrington, PA) were obtained from a specialized foot and ankle unit. 3D coordinates of specific anatomical landmarks (weightbearing points of the calcaneus, of the first and fifth metatarsal heads and the highest and centermost point on the talar dome) were collected. These data were processed with the TALAS system (CurveBeam), which resulted in an FAO value for each case. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were also assessed. Results: In normal cases, the mean value for FAO was 2.3% ± 2.9%, whereas in varus and valgus cases, the mean was −11.6% ± 6.9% and 11.4% ± 5.7%, respectively, with a statistically significant difference among groups (P < .001). The distribution of the normal population was Gaussian. The inter-and intraobserver reliability were 0.99 +/-0.00 and 0.97 +/-0.02 Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that the FAO is an efficient tool for measuring hindfoot alignment using WBCT. Previously published research in this field has looked at WBCT by adapting 2D biometrics. The present study introduces the concept of 3D biometrics and describes an efficient, semiautomatic tool for measuring hindfoot alignment. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

No abstract

Aims Cone beam CT allows cross-sectional imaging of the tibiofibular syndesmosis while the patient bears weight. This may facilitate more accurate and reliable investigation of injuries to, and reconstruction of, the syndesmosis but normal ranges of measurements are required first. The purpose of this study was to establish: 1) the normal reference measurements of the syndesmosis; 2) if side-to-side variations exist in syndesmotic anatomy; 3) if age affects syndesmotic anatomy; and 4) if the syndesmotic anatomy differs between male and female patients in weight-bearing cone beam CT views. Patients and Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 50 male and 50 female patients (200 feet) aged 18 years or more, who underwent bilateral, simultaneous imaging of their lower legs while standing in an upright, weight-bearing position in a pedCAT machine between June 2013 and July 2017. At the time of imaging, the mean age of male patients was 47.1 years (18 to 72) and the mean age of female patients was 57.8 years (18 to 83). We employed a previously described technique to obtain six lengths and one angle, as well as calculating three further measurements, to provide information on the relationship between the fibula and tibia with respect to translation and rotation. Results The upper limit of lateral translation in un-injured patients was 5.27 mm, so values higher than this may be indicative of syndesmotic injury. Anteroposterior translation lay within the ranges 0.31 mm to 2.59 mm, and -1.48 mm to 3.44 mm, respectively. There was no difference between right and left legs. Increasing age was associated with a reduction in lateral translation. The fibulae of men were significantly more laterally translated but data were inconsistent for rotation and anteroposterior translation. Conclusion We have established normal ranges for measurements in cross-sectional syndesmotic anatomy during weight-bearing and also established that no differences exist between right and left legs in patients without syndesmotic injury. Age and gender do, however, affect the anatomy of the syndesmosis, which should be taken into account at time of assessment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:348–352.

Background: The importance of the rotational profile of the first metatarsal is increasingly recognized in the surgical planning of hallux valgus. However, rotation in the normal population has only been measured in small series. We aimed to identify the normal range of first metatarsal rotation in a large series using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT). Methods: WBCT scans were retrospectively analyzed for 182 normal feet (91 patients). Hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, anteroposterior/lateral talus–first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch, and hindfoot alignment angle were measured using digitally reconstructed radiographs. Patients with abnormal values for any of these measures and those with concomitant pathology, previous surgery, or hallux rigidus were excluded. Final assessment was performed on 126 feet. Metatarsal pronation (MPA) and α angles were measured on standardized coronal computed tomography slices. Pronation was recorded as positive. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Mean MPA was 5.5 ± 5.1 (range, –6 to 25) degrees, and mean α angle was 6.9 ± 5.5 (range, –5 to 22) degrees. When considering the normal range as within 2 standard deviations of the mean, the normal range identified was −5 to 16 degrees for MPA and −4 to 18 degrees for α angle. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were excellent for both MPA (ICC = 0.80 and 0.97, respectively) and α angle (ICC = 0.83 and 0.95, respectively). There was a moderate positive correlation between MPA and α angle (Pearson coefficient 0.68, P < .001). Conclusion: Metatarsal rotation is variable in normal feet. Normal MPA can be defined as less than 16 degrees, and normal α angle can be defined as less than 18 degrees. Both MPA and α angle are reproducible methods for assessing rotation. Further work is needed to evaluate these angles in patients with deformity and to determine their significance when planning surgical correction of hallux valgus. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

No abstract

No abstract

Level IV, therapeutic study, case series.

Background: Hallux valgus is a multiplanar deformity that is often treated on the basis of 2-dimensional (2D) parameters and radiographs. Recurrence rates after surgical correction remain high, and failure to correct pronation of the metatarsal is increasingly stipulated as being part of the problem. Multiple methods of assessing metatarsal pronation have been proposed. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review identifying studies that measured metatarsal pronation and torsion on computed tomography (CT) scans. Specific methodology, patient groups, results, and reliability assessments were all reported. Results: We identified 14 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies measured 2D values on CT scan, and 3 studies used computer-based 3-dimensional (3D) modeling and artificial intelligence systems to help calculate pronation. Metatarsal pronation angle, α angle, sesamoid rotation angle, and measurements for torsion were the most commonly used methods. All angles and measurements were performed as 2D measurements, but the metatarsal pronation angle was also performed with 3D modeling. Reliability and reproducibility of the α angle and metatarsal pronation angle were excellent, despite being performed on studies with small numbers. Conclusion: Multiple methods have been reported to demonstrate first metatarsal pronation on CT, of which the α angle and the metatarsal pronation angle are the most pragmatic and useful in a clinical setting. Further work is needed to further validate the reliability of these measurements in larger series and to identify normal pronation and metatarsal torsion on weightbearing imaging. Further work is required to determine whether addressing pronation reduces recurrence rates and improves outcomes in surgery for hallux valgus. Level of Evidence: Level III