2017
DOI: 10.1177/1071100717690806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Biometrics for Hindfoot Alignment Using Weightbearing CT

Abstract: Background: Hindfoot alignment on 2D radiographs can present anatomical and operator-related bias. In this study, software designed for weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) was used to calculate a new 3D biometric tool: the Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO). We described the distribution of FAO in a series of data sets from clinically normal, varus, and valgus cases, hypothesizing that FAO values would be significantly different in the 3 groups. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 135 data sets (57 norm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
162
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
162
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other original measurements are expected to be developed, as already shown in a preliminary way. 62,63 Integration of these novel 3D measures of bone morphology with current kinematics or baropodometric analyses definitely has great potential, particularly for their synergy, and they will contribute to shed more light on the biomechanical status of these anatomical areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other original measurements are expected to be developed, as already shown in a preliminary way. 62,63 Integration of these novel 3D measures of bone morphology with current kinematics or baropodometric analyses definitely has great potential, particularly for their synergy, and they will contribute to shed more light on the biomechanical status of these anatomical areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, only minor motion artifacts were found in AJC images with upright CT in the present study (Table 1). Changes in hindfoot alignment have been assessed using upright cone beam CT [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], but it takes as long as 20 to 48 s to acquire images, and it is necessary for participants to support the body to reduce artifacts. In fact, moderate to severe motion artifacts were observed in the cone beam CT images of the knee and ankle [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have analyzed the effect of weightbearing on the hindfoot using magnetic resonance imaging [1] or conventional CT with loading devices [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] or upright cone beam CT [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. However, the effect of natural full weightbearing in a standing position has not been evaluated due to limitations of acquiring foot images under a physiological weightbearing condition using those imaging modalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) has increased in use for preoperative and postoperative assessment of patients with hindfoot disorders . This novel imaging modality improves the assessment of joint alignment and degeneration under weightbearing conditions (Figures and ) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 This novel imaging modality improves the assessment of joint alignment and degeneration under weightbearing conditions (Figures 1 and 4). 15,19,20 In summary, evaluation of clinical hindfoot alignment represents an undoubtedly crucial step in the overall assessment of patients with foot and ankle pathologies. However, assessment of hindfoot deformities should not be limited to visual inspection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%