The aim of this study was to assess the effect of milk with 0, 2.5 or 5 ppm F on progression and remineralization of caries-like root surface lesions using a pH cycling model. The root surface lesions were created utilizing a partially saturated lactic acid buffer at pH 4.6. Longitudinal sections were cut through the lesion and analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) and microradiography (MRG). The sections were then coated with an acid resistant varnish, except the outer natural surface that would be exposed to water, milk or fluoridated milk and cycled in a de- and remineralizing system for 2 weeks. The lesions were characterized again by PLM and MRG after treatment. A significant reduction in lesion progression was found by PLM and MRG after treatment with either non-fluoridated or fluoridated milk when compared to the control group. Using quantitative MRG, mineral change and distribution in the lesions were recorded. A possible protective effect of fluoridated milk on root surface caries was supported by a reduction in the progression of the lesions and an increase in the mineral within the lesion.
The purpose of this investigator-blinded, five-treatment, crossover human intraoral study was to evaluate the effects of two experimental dentifrice formulations containing either stannous fluoride (SnF2) or sodium fluoride (NaF) packaged with sodium hexametaphosphate in a dual-phase delivery system on demineralization-remineralization using an in situ model system. The experimental dentifrice formulations’ ability to alter demineralization-remineralization was compared to a series of three controls: SnF2-positive control, NaF-positive control and no-fluoride placebo-negative control. The single-section crown model, developed at the University of Iowa, was used to assess the fluoride efficacy of two experimental products versus the placebo containing no fluoride and positive controls. The results of the current in situ study suggest a clinical level of anticaries activity for the experimental SnF2 and NaF dentifrice formulations that was as good as either of the positive controls, when evaluated using polarized light microscopy. This supports the conclusion that the use of the sodium hexametaphosphate ingredient does not interfere with the normal fluoride activity of these toothpastes. In addition, the experimental SnF2 product was numerically better than both the NaF and placebo controls at preventing demineralization of sound root surfaces.
Background Chemokines and cytokines may occur in dentinal fluids in response to local infection and inflammation. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the presence and concentration of inflammatory mediators in fluid extracted from the coronal occlusal dentin of trimmed teeth. Design Freshly extracted sound, carious, and restored molars were trimmed through the enamel to expose the underlying dentin, etched with 35% phosphoric acid, and rinsed. Fluid was extracted from the coronal occlusal dentin of these trimmed teeth by centrifugation at 2,750 × g for 30 minutes. Results When assessed by MALDI-TOF, fluid extracted from the coronal occlusal dentin from 16 molars contained at least 117 peaks with different masses suggesting that this fluid was rich with molecules within the appropriate mass range of potential mediators. Indeed, when assessed for chemokines and cytokines, fluid extracted from the coronal occlusal dentin from 25 extracted molars with caries lesions, 10 extracted restored molars with occlusal amalgam, and 77 extracted sound molars contained IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12(p70), and IL-10. A significant elevation was found for TNF-α (p=0.041) in extracted fluid from teeth restored with amalgam fillings. Conclusions Overall, fluid extracted from the coronal occlusal dentin of trimmed teeth may be useful in identifying proteins and other molecules in dentin and pulpal fluids and determining their role as mediators in the pathogenesis of oral infection and inflammation.
Background/Aims: The use of chlorhexidine as a topically applied oral antiseptic is well documented; however, clinical studies examining the effects of chlorhexidine gel on in situ dental caries are limited. This study utilized an in situ caries model and a modified crossover design to examine whether the addition of a biweekly topical, alcohol-free, 1% chlorhexidine digluconate gel to a daily fluoridated dentifrice inhibited artificial caries in dental tissues better than the fluoridated dentifrice alone when compared to a nonfluoridated placebo dentifrice. Methods: Thirty patients were recruited based on their need for a mandibular, full crown. Artificial caries lesions were created in extracted human teeth and enamel and root tissue sections 100 µm in thickness were characterized using polarized light microscopy. The sections were fixed in the crown and placed on the prepared tooth. The participants were assigned a placebo toothpaste, a toothpaste with 1,100 ppm F or a 1,100 ppm F toothpaste followed by 1 ml of 1% chlorhexidine gel at day 1 and day 14 (chlorhexidine+). Patients were instructed to brush twice daily for 4 weeks. Following each round, the sections in the crown were replaced with new sections. The sections were recharacterized and the mean changes were compared using ANOVA at α = 0.05. Results: The chlorhexidine + Fdentifrice and the F dentifrice alone significantly reduced lesion area in enamel tissue when compared to the placebo dentifrice. Both treatments also inhibited lesion progression and initiation in root tissue better than control in this model system. Although the chlorhexidine+ group enhanced remineralization and inhibited lesion progression better than the F– dentifrice alone for all outcomes measured, the differences were not significant. Conclusions: The chlorhexidine, in conjunction with a fluoride dentifrice, was no more effective than the fluoride dentifrice alone. Further study is needed before this 1% alcohol-free chlorhexidine gel should be recommended as an adjunct to a fluoride dentifrice in the treatment of dental caries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.