Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was announced in early December 2019. The pandemic situation is declared. This study aimed to evaluate the role of biomarkers in estimating the severity and predicting the prognosis of COVID-19. Results A total of 116 confirmed patients were included in this study. The patients were evaluated clinically. The disease severity was assessed. The measured and calculated laboratory tests were done. The primary outcome is the 30-day mortality. Patients were assigned to the severe (14.7%) and non-severe (85.3%) groups. At IL-6 level of 32.3 pg/mL (the highest Youden’s index = 0.77), IL-6 can differentiate severe from non-severe patients with 82.4% sensitivity and 94.4% specificity. IL-6 can predict the severity [odds ratio of 87.7 (95% CI = 18.9-408.2) (P < 0.0001)]. After adjustment to the significant clinical and laboratory parameters, IL-6 had an adjusted odds ratio of 30.8 (95% CI = 1.1-728.3) (P = 0.046). A high CRP/albumin ratio of > 11.4 was associated with COVID-19 mortality [hazard ratio = 59.9 (95% CI = 7.4–488.3) (P < 0.0001)]. High CRP/albumin ratio had an adjusted hazard ratio of 26.5 (95% CI = 2.6-270.7) after adjustment of age and presence of co-morbidities (P = 0.006). Conclusion IL-6 level could effectively discriminate COVID-19 severity. CRP/albumin ratio was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality rate in patients with COVID-19. IL-6 and CRP/albumin ratio seem to be valuable biomarkers in evaluating the severity and prognosis of COVID-19, respectively.

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper limb entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve as it traverses the wrist at the carpal tunnel. Objectives: To compare the effect of single dose of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injected locally with that of corticosteroid in patients with CTS. Subjects and methods: A total of 60 patients with very mild to moderate unilateral CTS were recruited to the study. PRP was prepared via two centrifugation procedures. The patients were randomly divided into three groups PRP [i] group, PRP [ii] group, and a third group that received local corticosteroid injection (CS). The patients were followed up at 1.5 and 3 months by visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment. The severity and functional outcomes were evaluated through Boston CTS, and neurophysiological analyses were carried out. Results: On comparing the PRP [i], PRP [ii], and CS groups, a statistically significant enhancement of all outcome variables was observed in both PRP groups at follow-up except VAS at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.073 and P = 0.068, respectively) in PRP [ii] group. Conclusion: In CTS, PRP was a better treatment alternative with respect to pain and functional outcome. In addition, it was associated well with improved neurophysiological values than those observed after corticosteroid injection.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract