We summarize the various strands of research on peripheral vision and relate them to theories of form perception. After a historical overview, we describe quantifications of the cortical magnification hypothesis, including an extension of Schwartz's cortical mapping function. The merits of this concept are considered across a wide range of psychophysical tasks, followed by a discussion of its limitations and the need for non-spatial scaling. We also review the eccentricity dependence of other low-level functions including reaction time, temporal resolution, and spatial summation, as well as perimetric methods. A central topic is then the recognition of characters in peripheral vision, both at low and high levels of contrast, and the impact of surrounding contours known as crowding. We demonstrate how Bouma's law, specifying the critical distance for the onset of crowding, can be stated in terms of the retinocortical mapping. The recognition of more complex stimuli, like textures, faces, and scenes, reveals a substantial impact of mid-level vision and cognitive factors. We further consider eccentricity-dependent limitations of learning, both at the level of perceptual learning and pattern category learning. Generic limitations of extrafoveal vision are observed for the latter in categorization tasks involving multiple stimulus classes. Finally, models of peripheral form vision are discussed. We report that peripheral vision is limited with regard to pattern categorization by a distinctly lower representational complexity and processing speed. Taken together, the limitations of cognitive processing in peripheral vision appear to be as significant as those imposed on low-level functions and by way of crowding.

Three experiments assessed the development of children's part and configural (partrelational) processing in object recognition during adolescence. In total 312 school children aged 7-16 and 80 adults were tested in 3-AFC tasks to judge the correct appearance of upright and inverted presented familiar animals, artifacts, and newly learned multi-part objects, which had been manipulated either in terms of individual parts or part relations. Manipulation of part relations was constrained to either metric (animals, artifacts, and multi-part objects) or categorical (multi-part objects only) changes. For animals and artifacts, even the youngest children were close to adult levels for the correct recognition of an individual part change. By contrast, it was not until 11-12 years that they achieved similar levels of performance with regard to altered metric part relations.For the newly-learned multi-part objects, performance was equivalent throughout the tested age range for upright presented stimuli in case of categorical part-specific and partrelational changes. In case of metric manipulations, the results confirmed the data pattern observed for animals and artifacts. Together the results provide converging evidence, with studies of face recognition, for a surprisingly late consolidation of configural-metric relative to part-based object recognition.

Saccadic latencies measured in response to a step-wise displacement of the target may be substantially reduced if a gap separates the offset of the initial fixation point and the onset of the peripheral target. According to Fischer and Ramsperger (1984) this paradigm provokes a bimodal latency distribution which consists of a peak of very fast saccadic responses (express saccades) at about 110 ms and another peak arising from somewhat slower saccades (regular saccades). Using again the gap paradigm, we investigated the effect of an additional go/no-go (i.e. target trial/catch trial) decision on saccadic latencies. The experiments yielded the following results: (i) the distribution between the peaks of express and regular saccades strongly depends on the proportion of catch trials introduced into the trial sequence, which suggests the existence of different modes of operation of the decision processes for express and regular saccades. (ii) The catch trial effect on saccadic latency proved to be a local phenomenon in time: saccades which follow catch trials tend to be slower than those following target trials.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Human visual preferences are not fully determined by (objective) structural regularities of image stimuli but also depend on their learned (subjective) interpretation. These two aspects are reflected in distinct complementary factors underlying preference judgements, and may be related to complementary modes of visual processing in the brain.

The classification behaviour of human observers with respect to compound Gabor signals is tested at foveal and extrafoveal retinal positions. Classification performance is analysed in terms of a probabilistic classification model recently proposed by Rentschler, Jüttner and Caelli [(1994) Vision Research, 34, 669-687]. The analysis allows inferences about structure and dimensionality of the individual internal representations underlying the classification task and their temporal evolution during the learning process. Using this technique it is found that the internal representations of direct and eccentric viewing are intrinsically incommensurable, in the sense that extrafoveal pattern representations are characterized by a lower perceptual dimension in feature space relative to the corresponding physical input signals, whereas foveal representations are not. The observed deficits cannot be renormalized by size scaling (cortical magnification); however, they can be partially reduced by learning although the learning progress strongly depends on the observer's practice. The structural incommensurability between foveal and extrafoveal representations poses constraints on possible forms of foveal-extrafoveal interaction, which might have implications on related perceptual phenomena such as visual stability across saccadic eye movements.