2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(03)00194-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of configural 3D object recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the symmetric objects the main effect of priming condition was significant (F(2,108)=2.54, p<0.05) whereas the interaction of priming condition and age was not (F(6,108)=1.62, p=0.14). Figure 2A suggests that, consistent with previous results [20], haptic priming facilitates learning of older children but not that of children in the youngest age group. An additional a posteriori contrast analysis showed a significant (p<0.05) advantage of haptic priming relative to the control condition in age groups 9-10 (non-symmetric and symmetric objects) and 15-16 (non-symmetric objects only), which turned into a significant disadvantage for children aged 8-9 (non-symmetric and symmetric objects).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the symmetric objects the main effect of priming condition was significant (F(2,108)=2.54, p<0.05) whereas the interaction of priming condition and age was not (F(6,108)=1.62, p=0.14). Figure 2A suggests that, consistent with previous results [20], haptic priming facilitates learning of older children but not that of children in the youngest age group. An additional a posteriori contrast analysis showed a significant (p<0.05) advantage of haptic priming relative to the control condition in age groups 9-10 (non-symmetric and symmetric objects) and 15-16 (non-symmetric objects only), which turned into a significant disadvantage for children aged 8-9 (non-symmetric and symmetric objects).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…at an age of 13-14 years [20]. The present study aimed to further substantiate the link between the development of crossmodal learning and the representations underlying object recognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, a recent functional brain imaging study showed that full development of coherent motion in hMT+ is not reached until adolescence (Bucher et al, 2006). Tasks inducing dynamic visual adaptation (Schrauf et al, 1999), configural object recognition (Rentschler et al, 2004) and haptic priming upon configural visual stimuli (Jüttner et al, 2006) require even stronger visual processing demands and possibly the involvement of dorsal stream processing in object recognition. It has been shown that these functions do not mature until adolescence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others, however, suggested that a third area, probably in the posterior, superior parietal cortex, needs to be activated that binds both motion and shape processing areas (Zeki, 2001). This (temporary) binding between shape and motion may be related to attention or spatial processing, and which may have a different developmental time course (Oakes et al, 2006;Rentschler et al, 2004;Ross-Sheehy et al, 2003). Thus, it remains unknown to what extend neural development of SFM processing depends on both the development of motion processing related areas and areas that are not directly related to shape or motion processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%