The aetiological agents of onychomycosis that we found differ from those found in other countries, suggesting that the heat and humidity of the Colombian climate could favour yeast nail infections. The lowest MICs for Candida species (obtained with voriconazole, followed by itraconazole) may be explained by emerging resistant strains. Against dermatophytes, the lowest MICs were obtained with terbinafine, followed by voriconazole. MIC values for the evaluated agents were higher for non-dermatophyte filamentous fungi than for other fungi. As MIC breakpoints have not yet been established for onychomycosis therapies, it remains unclear if in vitro activities of antifungal drugs are predictive of clinical outcome. Well-designed clinical studies are necessary to assist clinicians in choosing the best antifungal agents.
Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa display several resistance mechanisms to carbapenems and such variety makes it difficult to infer from the antibiogram. The aim of this study was to determine the carbapenem resistance genes in P. aeruginosa isolates with different profiles of phenotypic susceptibility to these antibiotics.
Materials and methods: From a microbial collection of P. aeruginosa isolates from infected patients, 40 isolates with different carbapenem resistance profiles were selected. The carbapenemases genes, and expression of the OprD porin, the MexAB-OprM efflux pump and the β-lactamase AmpC were determined.
Results: From a total of 40 isolates evaluted, in 21 (52.5%) any mechanism of resistance evaluated were detected. In the meropenem-resistant group, overexpression of AmpC (n = 1) and decreased expression of MexAB-OprM (n = 2) and OprD (n = 1) were found. A decrease in the expression of MexAB-OprM was observed in imipenem-resistant group (n = 3) and mutations in the gene encoding the OprD porin (n = 1). Finally, the presence of carbapenemases (VIM, n= 3, KPC-2 / VIM, n = 1) was detected in imipenem-meropenem resistant isolates.
Conclusion: The phenotypic susceptibility profiles in P. aeruginosa isolates were not explained by the molecular mechanisms explored, with the exception of carbapenemase-producing isolates. These results evidence the complexity of the antibiotic resistance mechanisms involved in this bacterium.
Introduction: Carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli is a worldwide problem, which represent a health concern, because most of its resistance mechanisms are encoded by plasmids, therefore easily transmissible in hospital settings. Many methods have been proposed to detect such resistance, but screening is still challenging, recently the modified carbapenem inactivation method has shown promising results, however more studies need to be performed. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the performance of the mCIM in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli isolates.
Materials and methods: From a microbial collection with molecular characterization of carbapenemase genes previously conducted, 100 Gram-negative bacilli isolates were selected, fifty-two non-carbapenemase producing and 48 carbapenemase-producing isolates. The mCIM was performed according to the CLSI guidelines, and to assess the validity of the method sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
Results: The sensitivity of the mCIM observed in this study was 96% (46/48) and the specificity was 96,2% (50/52). Most of the Gram-negative bacilli carrying a carbapenemase gene were mCIM-positive, moreover, in carbapenem-resistant isolates that do not produce a carbapenemase (Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenters) the results of the mCIM were negatives.
Conclusion: Overall the mCIM provides a low-cost alternative for the screening of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli. Our findings highlight that mCIM is a sensitive and specific method to assess carbapenemase-producing in Gram negative bacilli non-fermenters and Enterobacteriaceae as Enterobacter cloacae.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.