JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Many regulated streams are characterized by high variable and unpredictable flow regimes. Since changes in streamflow directly modify physical habitat, streams with such highly variable flows provide highly unstable aquatic habitats. We evaluated the effect of artificial streamflow fluctuations on stream fish communities by comparing fish densities, in species and habitat groups, between two rivers differing in daily flow regime: on with with a natural flow, and one with highly regulated flows. We developed a simple model describing the relationship between available streams habitat and its use by 15 species or size classes of fish in the natural river. Species and size classes that used a specific set of microhabitat conditions were identified by comparing habitat characteristics for samples with and without each type of fish; for fish that used a particular type of microhabitat, we grouped species and size classes according to similarity in microhabitat use. Next, we categorized stream habitat samples in both the natural and regulated rivers into groups on the basis of fish habitat use criteria. Fish densities for each fish and habitat group were ten individually compared between the two rivers. An abundant (>90% of all fish) and diverse (nine species) group of small—fish species and size classes were restricted to microhabitat that was characterized as shallow in depth, slow in current velocity, and concentrated along stream margins. This group of fish was reduced in abundance in the regulated river and absent at the study site with the greatest flow fluctuation. Another fish group included species and size classes that used either a broad range of habitat or a microhabitat that was deep, fast, or both, and was concentrated in midstream areas. The density of fish in this group was higher in the regulated river and peaked at the sites with the greatest fluctuations in flow. Highly variable and unpredictable flow regimes appear to be a high—frequency disturbance that effects fish differently depending on the way they use stream habitat and acts to reduce community complexity.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

An electrofishing device and sampling procedure was developed to sample lotic microhabitats. The device consists of a rectangular electrode frame powered by an alternating current generator. The device was very effective in immobilizing fish within the electrode frame. A time delay between setting and sampling electrode frames permitted a period without disturbance prior to sampling. No significant correlations were found between capture rates and time delays greater than 11 minutes. Consistent results were obtained in repeated sampling of a variety of microhabitats within a single stream reach. The device and sampling procedure allows multispecies abundances to be quantified with regard to discrete units of microhabitat and a priori sampling designs to be used.

Artificial fluctuations in stream flow caused by hydroelectric power dams can degrade fish habitat and reduce the abundance and diversity of riverine fish faunas. Increased minimum water releases and reduced fluctuations in discharge may mitigate these effects. In this study, we compared shoreline fish abundance and diversity before and after an enhanced flow regime was implemented on the Tallapoosa River (Alabama) downstream of a hydroelectric dam. Before the minimum-flow regime, only eight species of fish were collected 3 km downstream from the dam, and all were classified as macrohabitat generalises. After the minimum flow was initiated, species richness 3 km below the dam more than doubled, and over half of the species collected were classified as fluvial specialists. Fish community response to the enhanced flow was not as great at a site 37 km downstream from the dam, where species richness was similar between the two periods. However, more species classified as fluvial specialists were collected after the minimum flow regime than before enhanced flows at this site. Additionally, relative abundance of species classified as fluvial specialists increased from less than 40% of fish collected before enhanced flows to over 80% after minimum flows began. Our results suggest that the enhanced flow regime provided conditions supporting a relatively abundant and diverse fish assemblage more reflective of a riverine system.