No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objective. Exercise has beneficial effects on pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA), yet the underlying mechanisms are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of exercise on pressure-pain sensitivity in patients with knee OA. Methods. In a randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned to 12 weeks of supervised exercise therapy (ET; 36 sessions) or a no attention control group (CG). Pressure-pain sensitivity was assessed by cuff pressure algometry on the calf of the most symptomatic leg. The coprimary outcomes were pressure-pain thresholds (PPTs) and cumulated visual analog scale pain scores during constant pressure for 6 minutes at 125% of the PPT as a measure of temporal summation (TS) of pressure-pain. Secondary outcomes included self-reported pain using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire. Analyses were based on the "per-protocol" population (participants following the protocol). Results. Sixty participants were randomized (31 in ET group, 29 in CG), and the per-protocol population included 48 participants (25 in ET group, 23 in CG). At followup, mean group differences in the change from baseline were 3.1 kPa (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.2, 6.0; P ‫؍‬ 0.038) for the PPT, 2,608 mm ؋ seconds (95% CI 458, 4,758; P ‫؍‬ 0.019) for TS, and 6.8 points (95% CI 1.2, 12.4; P ‫؍‬ 0.018) for KOOS pain, all in favor of ET. Conclusion. Pressure-pain sensitivity, TS, and self-reported pain are reduced among patients completing a 12-week supervised exercise program compared to a no attention CG. These results demonstrate beneficial effects of exercise on basic pain mechanisms and further exploration may provide a basis for optimized treatment.

Objective. Medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by pain and associated with abnormal knee moments during walking. The relationship between knee OA pain and gait changes remains to be clarified, and a better understanding of this link could advance the treatment and prevention of disease progression. This study investigated changes in knee moments during walking following experimental knee pain in healthy volunteers, and whether these changes replicated the joint moments observed in medial knee OA patients. Methods. In a crossover study, 34 healthy subjects were tested on 3 different days; gait analyses were conducted before, during, and after pain induced by hypertonic saline injections (0.75 ml) into the infrapatellar fat pad. Isotonic saline and sham injections were used as control conditions. Peak moments in frontal and sagittal planes were analyzed. The results were compared with data from 161 medial knee OA patients. The patients were divided into less severe OA and severe OA categories, which was based on radiographic disease severity of the medial compartment. Results. Experimental knee pain led to reduced peak moments in the frontal and sagittal planes in the healthy subjects, which were similar to the patterns observed in less severe OA patients while walking at the same speed. Conclusion. In healthy subjects, pain was associated with reductions in knee joint moments during walking in a manner similar to less severe knee OA patients. The experimental model may be used to study mechanically-driven knee OA progression and preventive measures against abnormal joint loading in knee OA.

Weight loss is an excellent short-term investment in terms of joint loading for patients with combined obesity and knee OA. The effects of sustained weight loss on disease progression and symptoms in relation to biomechanical factors remain to be shown.

The aim of this study was to examine the learning effect during a set of isokinetic measurements, to evaluate the reliability of the Biodex System 3 PRO dynamometer, and to compare the Biodex System 3 PRO and the Lido Active dynamometers on both extension and flexion over the elbow and the knee at 60 degrees s(-1). Thirteen (nine women, four men) healthy participants were measured five times using the Biodex and once using the Lido dynamometer. The intervals between the first four tests were 20 min, and 1 week between tests 4 and 5. Between Biodex and Lido measurements there was a 20 min time interval. When comparing the first five measurements (Biodex), no systematic effect over time and an excellent reliability were found with respect to elbow and knee flexion and extension. No difference in muscle strength (Nm) between the Biodex and Lido was observed for knee flexion (P = 0.59), knee extension (P = 0.18) and elbow extension (P = 0.63). However, elbow flexion showed a 14.8% (95% CI: 11.2-18.4%; P = 0.0001) higher peak torque on Biodex. In conclusion, no learning effect was observed and the Biodex proved to be a highly reliable isokinetic dynamometer. A difference was observed when comparing Biodex and Lido on elbow flexion, but the difference did not outrange the expected variation found with a typical isokinetic measurement, which is why both sets of equipment seem applicable in clinical practice.